Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: RPM Mack Bulldog


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Date:
RPM Mack Bulldog
Permalink   


 Just wondered if anyone here had built the RPM 1/72 Mack Bulldog HC3 early? It appears to be a British variant, judging by the driver and the gun and limber being towed, does the kit include British decals, or need any?


http://www.ibg.com.pl/images/Rpm72401.jpg


Thats the specific kit, looks very nice, can't wait to get it (ordered it today)



__________________
http://www.mslelectrical.com/charity.htm


Captain

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink   

Hello!


RPM has released four Bulldogs: HC3, EHT, EHC and EHC1. In all these boxes are the same sprues with parts for the different variants. So you have got - for example - two sets of wheels. I think it's nice to have some spare wheels.


All four kits contain the same decal sheet with decals for - I think - US vehicles, for example "ENGINEER DEPARTMENT", "U.S. ENGINEER BLACKSMITH SHOP NO. 1" and other black and white numbers and U.S.A. signs. There are two red decals "U.S.A. 51890" numbers, too. I think there are no British or French decals included.


I've built two Bulldogs so far. The parts are nicely detailed and the kit instructions are well done. I had some difficulties installing the rear axle and the chain mechanism. I have not yet finished these models, I have to paint them.


I hope that RPM is able to sell many Bulldogs so there's a chance that other softskins will follow!


Kind regards


Thomas Bücheler



__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 498
Date:
Permalink   

are they planning to scale those kits up?

__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Here's a review:


http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/builds/rpm/build_rpm_mack_flat.shtml


There's another one knocking about somewhere on the net. I'll try and find it. RPM are promising it in 1/35, but apparently have been doing so for quite some time.



__________________


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Date:
Permalink   

 Thanks, looks like a beautiful kit, even the engine! Wish more companies would include the engine etc on models, even if you can't see it it makes the model more interesting than just an empty shell.

__________________
http://www.mslelectrical.com/charity.htm


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 233
Date:
Permalink   

I just bought a Bulldog and confirm that it looks like a very nice kit. RPM release now 2 tank version, could be very nice close to a plane for refueling. I don't know if it looks realistic as I never saw a picture describing a scene like that.


Does anybody has more information ?


Eric from Tokyo



__________________

Eric

On going : Obice da 305/17 su affusto de Stefano, Mark 1 female ...

Finished : Dennis 3 tons lorry, Jeffery Poplavko, Renault EG, Renault FT



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 134
Date:
Permalink   

Howdy fellas,

I was quite glad to see the Bulldogs show up at my LHS, but was almost equally dissappointed {sorry you 1/72'rs } to see it only in that scale......once again, I get to feel the pain of being the outcast 1/35th builder of WWI subject matter.......

Tread.

__________________
"....You're a better man than I, Gunga Din..."


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Date:
Permalink   

 They'll be on their way no doubt - Just like us small scalers had to wait for RPM to bring their FT17 out in 1/72 when it was already in 1/35, and the same with the Ford Model T's (still hoping they bring out an ambulance in 1/35)

__________________
http://www.mslelectrical.com/charity.htm


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 134
Date:
Permalink   



I understand Robert, I was just taking the opportunity to have some cheese with my 'whine' .....that's all

In fact, I need to pick up that 1/35th RPM kit....the only one my LHS has is the smake-generator.

Tread.

__________________
"....You're a better man than I, Gunga Din..."


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 498
Date:
Permalink   

there is a 1/35 ambulance in resin done by soem italian company



__________________


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Date:
Permalink   

 Got my Mack Bulldog in the post this morning - thing is, the variant on the box art isn't actually provided in the kit, as the nose shape is different, rather annoyed about that but no point in sending it back because it cost me £3 p&p just getting it here, which is quite a lot to a 17 year old student.

__________________
http://www.mslelectrical.com/charity.htm


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Hi
Im also comtemplating to build the "fuel tanker" version of the Mack Bulldog. The kit looks very nice indeed. but comparing some parts to plans and pictures there are certain little discrepancies, perhaps pertaining a this exact model. The bonnet top doesn't have the hinges, and the edges of the top piece have two small indentations that look too simmetric to be a short casting of the piece. In any case, I guess I'll retrofit it to make it look like the drawings. It also have a rather thick looking windscreen part, which seems to be a bit untypical for the WW1 era.
In fact I'm contemplatig to use the extra spoked wheels to mount the large fuel bowser in some sort of trailer and keep the truck itself as a lorry.
The fuel bowser has a sort of "cabin" at the rear with a separate door, but no detail inside. I guess that this was an area where the different partitions of the tank were closed or open with several pipes and valves, a detail that I can't find anywhere, just in later models like the Opel Bliz, so I'll leave the part closed and
undetailed inside. I added some bumps and wrinkles to the door and service areas of the bowser, just to take that "plastic" look from the parts.

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 456
Date:
Permalink   

I have built the RPM Mack Bulldog, and thinks it's their best kit this far. The fit is much better than their frustratingly complex FT-17. So go ahead: you will find it worth your while!

__________________
/Peter Kempf


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

I posted a link to the review of the Mack a while ago. This is the important bit:

Step 16 shows you to put the differential (not exactly what its called, but the part that translates the driveshaft revolutions to the chain-drive) on the leaf-springs. DONT. Place it ahead of that unit and look ahead to step 19 & 20 to see how it will mate up with the chain-drive parts. On step 19, DONT put the axle where they show in the directions either, but look ahead to step 20 to see where theyve positioned it. Once you get beyond these steps, all the rest falls into place.

That's exactly the problem I had. If you do what it says above, all is well.

__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks Peter, I was about to order one of those FT17s... instead I think I'll get me a Revell FT17, it's been said that's the old Matchbox kit.

__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks James, I'll look for that article... is it posted here in this website?
Has anyone replaced the solid Mack logo on the bonnet for a more appropiate etched grille? If so...how to keep the logo on the grille?
Ideas?
D.
it would be a shame not to display that petite engine somehow

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

It's the link at the top: http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/builds/rpm/build_rpm_mack_flat.shtml

Yes, the Revell FT17 is the old Matchbox one, but, as Peter pointed out to me, it's 1/76 and noticeably smaller than the HäT and RPM ones.

Still no sign of the Mirage Models FT17.

Here are pics of the Mack Tanker versions.


Attachments
__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Ooops! Oh well, I had read the review a few days ago but I didn't noticed what you pointed out. Thanks again!
My kit is the one depicted on the second picture, as if refueling in an airfield. I have some doubts about this, mostly because all the pictures of airplanes being refueled on the field were assisted by a couple of crewmen using a simple cart with a barrel and a hand pump, the fuel being filtered by a gauze before being poured into the airplane reservoir. Perhaps the fuel was carried to the airfields in fuel tankers like these, but I'm suspecting that most of the times it was simply carried in flat lorries contained in barrels, unless supplying large air bases. And then, being the large airfields away from the front lines, the complex camo scheme would be unjustified.
Unless a picture of such vehicle and scheme is produced! (something that seems to happen as soon as the model is completed)
This truck also has a strange wooden "bumper" in front, that I haven't seen in the other kits nor in pictures. Was it a relatively common feature?

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 456
Date:
Permalink   

The best bet - if you have the money - is to do a kit hack of the HÄT FT-17 and the RPM FT-17. Use the tracks, turret and hull from the HÄT kit, and detail it with parts from the RPM kit. It is also quite possible to do all that detailing on your own, using plastic card and copper wire.

The Revell kit IS the old Matchbox kit. It is very nice, but 1/76. If Scale isn't that important, then you could go for the Revell option.

The best FT-17 available is the 1/72 resin kit by Al.By. It is super.

__________________
/Peter Kempf


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   


Hi i guess it takes a particular type of person to put the RPM kit together as there are to many fragile fiddly parts for the running gear personally i enjoyed it and bought another one, the old matchbox(revell) kit is good value since you also get some usefull figures and a Char b, the hät kit is by far the quickest build of any that Ive done....but then it is intended as a games model.....

                time spent to build approx                          complexity
matchbox            1 hour                                         easy
RPM                4hours at least                       over complex,  hard
HÄt                   20 minutes                 a chimp can make this one, 7 parts

all OOB heres a pic for comparison....

Rpm kits need not be expensive I got mine from an ebay shop for 8.95euro+2p+p hannants had a special for 5.95 sterling a considerable reduction on normal price.....

matchbox 6-7euro and hät 7-8euro for 2


so about the edits the ****  post wont except the euro symbol


Cheers

-- Edited by Ironsides at 13:13, 2007-07-11

-- Edited by Ironsides at 13:20, 2007-07-11

-- Edited by Ironsides at 13:23, 2007-07-11

Attachments
__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks for the advice on the FT17... I guess I'll have to abandon my idea of making a tank carrier out of the Mack truck "sans" fuel tank.
Were Mack trucks used as lorries for air squadrons? Were they used by the Amerikaners or the Englanders? Which colours?
Sorry for the many questions!

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   


Hi as far as i'm aware mack trucks were used by the british and the french in large numbers so it wouldnt suprise me if they turned up at aerodromes i would expect camo to be typical for the relevant nationality, british various shades of khaki, american olive drab or disruptive camo, french possibly grey........


Cheers

__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks Ironsides... A French truck would be nice, as it would match the ambulance I'm finishing, the RPM Ford T painted as the American Field Service.
However I should provide transportation for the British models of my aerodrome... ah, decisions, decisions!
D.


__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   


Hi theres also something called service colour used by the brits a sort of pale green there was thread on this forum not to long ago dealing with it....

Cheers

__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Pale green? Well that would be a change... as far as I know, all the RFC and early RAF tenders were khaki, and on the darker side, judging by the pictures. Of course, all the pictures I've seen were of Subsidy trucks, I don't know about foreign designs pressed into service.
D.

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   


Hi heres a link to the service colour thread

http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=63528&p=3&topicID=11784373

unfortunatly b/w pics tend to be unreliable since from my own observations of known dark colours can sometimes turn up appearing light and vice versa, rather beyond my knowledge here but i think it depends on so many photograpic variables that working out exact colour and its lightness or darkness by this means is unlikely.......given that the original photographic method is unknown......personally I think some experimentation is in order using the old recipes but who wants 100Ibs of paint? I do think however it may be possible to make smaller batches...

contempary artwork does show a range of light greens and browns although this may be artistic licence.....

Cheers

-- Edited by Ironsides at 23:05, 2007-07-11

__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard