Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Why No Allied "Uberlandwagen"?


Brigadier

Status: Offline
Posts: 257
Date:
Why No Allied "Uberlandwagen"?
Permalink   


The Germans used the chassis of the A7V tank for a simple carry cart vehicle to supply the front lines.  The French used converted St. Chamond tanks while the British used converted Mark tanks.  Why didn't the Allied forces resort to using their own tank chassis to make carry carts, which should have been simpler to manufacture and operate?



__________________
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
RE: Why No Allied
Permalink   


I'd have thought the Gun Carrier would fill that description?

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
RE: Why No Allied "Uberlandwagen"?
Permalink   


Imho, the British rhomboids didn't have a chassis. I'm sure someone will explain it better, but the rhomboids couldn't be modified in that way. The use of the Gun Carrier was a bit of improvisation. But the Allies clearly came to recognise the need for an all-terrain supply vehicle, and the answer was the Newton Cargo Carrier. An order for 20,000 shows they took it very seriously.



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard