Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Roden Vauxhall staff car


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 825
Date:
Roden Vauxhall staff car
Permalink   


Hi,I have just received the above,an excellent kit. On the box label it has 1:72nd scale but on examining the sprues I have come to the conclusion it is nearer 1:76th scale.

I took another look at their FWD kit and realised that to is nearer 1:76th.

Has any one else noticed this or do I need new glasses??



__________________
Barry John


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 187
Date:
Permalink   

The Vauxhall D25 has a wheelbase of 132", apparently. How does that compare with the kit dimensions?

__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 825
Date:
Permalink   

Michel

Will check that one out.I compared it to the 1:76th plans by Lacey and it's definitley nearer 1:76th.



__________________
Barry John


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Barry,

I got mine a few weeks ago and like you thought it looked a very nice kit although there was some flash which was surprising for a new tool.

Unfortunately from my measurements and visual observations it's got some serious shape a dimensional issues which is real shame seeing as there are surviving WW.1 D Type staff cars that could have been measured.

The dimensions I'm working from are:

Wheel base - 3353mm - 1/72 = 46.57mm
Length (chassis) - 4420mm - 1/72 = 61.4mm
O/A Width - 1727mm - 1/72 = 24mm
Track - 1372mm - 1/72 = 19mm

The wheel base, chassis length and width appear to be about right for 1/72. The mudguards and running boards are the right length front to back with the arches in the right place, they're possibly a tad narrow.

The real issue I can see is with the body though, it's too narrow and almost parallel sided in plan view, like most cars of this era it should taper out noticeably from front to rear. Try sitting your two Crossley passengers on the back seat and you'll see it's really cramped even for two 1/76 figures.
The bonnet and scuttle area is far too low and too flat, the scuttle should be considerably higher than the body sides and have a pronounced arch to it and the radiator shell appears to be slightly undersize.

So in some respects it's probably closer to 1/72 scale than 1/76 but with all the inaccuracies it's not really anything! I'll probably use the chassis and running gear for mine and scratchbuild a new body.


The attached image should illustrate the scuttle/bonnet issue.  





-- Edited by CrashandBern on Friday 23rd of December 2016 01:46:46 PM

Attachments
__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard