Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Char 2C


Sergeant

Status: Offline
Posts: 26
Date:
Char 2C
Permalink   


I'm sure I read somewhere (thought it was on this site but can't find it now!) that the 2 stowage bins in front of the main turret where later additions just prior to WW2. Can anyone confirm if this is indeed the case or I simply imagined it? Any photos would be great too.

Many thanks

Gary

 

EDIT: Think I've found the answer to my question!

20152310164030.jpg


Anyone have any further info about this particular tank - No.91? 



-- Edited by NGBZ on Monday 21st of August 2017 10:10:03 AM

__________________
R39


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:
Permalink   

Sorry for this mistake by sending the post.



-- Edited by R39 on Monday 21st of August 2017 07:54:08 PM

__________________

Friendly yours Philippe.

R39


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:
Permalink   


Here som links for more information.
The FCM2c never saw war operations in the great War 14-18.
In WWII they where saborded on the railway convoi to prévent they fall in  ennemy hands.
Only the 91 was récuperated by whermacht en sent to Berlin.
The n° 97 "Normandie" received an heavier armour in august 1939 you can see it in the link www.worldwarphotos.info/gallery/france/tanks-france/char-2c/

www.chars-francais.net/2015/index.php/engins-blindes/chars
www.chars-francais.net/2015/index.php/classement-individuel/fcm-2c



-- Edited by R39 on Monday 21st of August 2017 07:55:41 PM

__________________

Friendly yours Philippe.



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2318
Date:
Permalink   

 

Char 2C #91 was badly damaged when the tanks were blown up by the French. Most images show the left side - the right side

had a large hole (attached). #99 was taken by the Germans - I've read that it was later captured by the Red Army and was photographed

in (then) East Germany in 1948.

Charlie

 



Attachments
__________________
R39


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:
Permalink   

CharlieC, you are right I made a number mistake; it is te n°99 that was taken by the germans and not the n° 91.
There is a very little hope that the n° 99 may be still existing somewhere in Russia today.




__________________

Friendly yours Philippe.



Sergeant

Status: Offline
Posts: 26
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks for the answers guys. Much appreciated.

Here's where I'm at with the build....

<a rel=i.imgur.com/05u5rHg.jpg">

<a rel=i.imgur.com/jJo8qbQ.jpg">

<a rel=i.imgur.com/vVQz1De.jpg">

<a rel=i.imgur.com/N2PpjiF.jpg">

<a rel=i.imgur.com/ZpbefBX.jpg">

She's big!!!!!

<a rel=i.imgur.com/nA8s0xu.jpg">

Any definative evidence out there as to colour used on the 2c? Instructions say Vallejo 71.015 which is similar to Tamiya XF27 Black Green (I prefer Tamiya paints). Is this likely to be correct?

Gary

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2318
Date:
Permalink   

 

The 1925 instruction says uniform "vert olive matt". I think Tamiya XF-62 would be too dark and XF-71 too light.

XF-27 seems to be similar to dark Brunswick Green which possibly isn't yellow enough and too dark.

The images of the Char 2C seem to suggest a single colour - no camouflage.

Charlie

 



-- Edited by CharlieC on Saturday 26th of August 2017 10:20:26 AM



-- Edited by CharlieC on Saturday 26th of August 2017 11:40:10 AM

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 432
Date:
Permalink   

Certainly at least three of them had cammo - 91, 93, and 99 according to the photos I've got.  I suspect that they all had one form or another during their service and only the one - 93 - was kept colourful - possibly for parades or films.

The same goes for the bottom side skirts - on, off, and front half missing.  I presume that they got a real bashing when doing cross-country work?



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard