IIRC Michel Tanker spotted this a while ago and clarified matters. Unfortunately, I can't remember what the outcome was, but it revolves around a misprint somewhere. I'll try to find it.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Charles: Have emailed Michel, but no joy as yet. However, gleaned this from Pages 14-18 Forum:
les Caterpillars Renault, type FB, de 110 HP du type "caterpillar porteur", commandés à 350 exemplaires et apparus en 1917.
That rings a bell. I think FP was a misprint.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Just to stir the pot or muddy the waters or mangle my metaphors ...
Wokepedia has it that the Renault FB was a lightened version of the Renault EG 4-wheel drive truck. It was not ultimately produced.
"In 1914, Renault developed a lighter version, the FB, but it was abandoned for concentrating on the EG."
This is a quote from: Boniface, Jean-Michel; Jeudy, Jean-Gabriel (1996). Les camions de la victoire: le service automobile pendant la Grande guerre , 1914–1918 [Victory trucks: automotive service during the Great War, 1914–1918] (in French). Editions Ch. Massin. ISBN2-7072-0300-9.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.