Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: a7v #503 Theunissen


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Date:
a7v #503 Theunissen
Permalink   


just saw this photo for the first time. apparently taken in September 1918. I had not found any reference to 503 being named Theunissen nor for any A7Vs being painted with the commander's name. Does anyone have any more details on this and also on Oblt Heinz Theunissen? I have seen reference to him in the Freikorps and I know he was still around to collect his commemorative tank crew badge in the early 1920s but then i have nothing.  I work for Qld Museum and handle all of the enquiries about Mephisto which Theunissen was the last commander. Any other information on the crew members would also be appreciated. 



Attachments
__________________
damien fegan


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2396
Date:
Permalink   

 

The forum software didn't know what to do with .jfif files - I converted it to to regular .jpg

Charlie

 



Attachments
__________________


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks for that!



__________________
damien fegan


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2396
Date:
Permalink   

 

According to Rainer Starsheim and Max Hundleby in the Tankograd book on the A7Vs, #503 was sent to the Saarburg area in late August 1918 and remained there for tank familiarisation training until 4 October. It's noted that #503 was named "Heiland" after 2nd Lt Heiland, the tank commander.

Charlie

   



__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink   

Wasn’t the A7V named “Heiland” the one with chassis number 540? And the 503 didn’t have a specific name, as far as we know.

Lieutenant Heinz Theunissen was a German officer during the First World War and commander of the famous A7V assault tank (vehicle number 506), which he personally christened "Mephisto."

Initially, the vehicle had been internally designated "Theunissen"—after the officer himself—before he renamed it in mid-April 1918. 



-- Edited by Hedi on Tuesday 20th of October 2026 06:23:20 PM

__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink   

Originally, the armored superstructure of vehicle 503 did not have a hatch in the front armor. It became evident, however, that the gun crew’s ability to orient themselves—relying solely on the sight and the small pistol port—was insufficient; consequently, a large rectangular opening was subsequently cut into the armor, which could be closed by means of a two-part hatch.



Attachments
__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard