I thought I'd bung this post in this section, as it's a 1952 subject. From an absolutely awesome site with tons of Modern Mechanix magazine covers and articles comes this:
The whole article is there, split up into its individual pages - you can also use the various buttons onscreen to muck about with the size of the image (FS is flamin' huge!).
And so you can see what I'm on about before clicking on the link, here's an image I stitched together from the individual pages:
There's much other insanity on that site - get the 'Tumbleweed Tank' proposal of 1936!
Take a look at the members galleries on the armorama site, there is a gentleman who built one 'Tumbleweed Tank' , and placed it in a diorama.
It looks very nice, not 100% accurate, but none the less very impressive. And the figure is awesome as well. He based it on the cover of the Modern Mechanix magazine.
All the Best
Tim R
-- Edited by Tim R at 21:36, 2007-04-25
__________________
"The life given us by nature is short; but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal" -Cicero 106-43BC
Tim, that sounds very interesting, thanks! Do you have a link or even just the name of the modeller? I tried using Tumbleweed Tank (and just Tumbleweed) as a search term, but got bugger-all. I find the Armorama site a pain in the arse to navigate, to be honest...
Hey Roger Sorry for the confusion, I could not remember his name.. It is a good model of the Tumbleweed Tank, I just wish he would have added more detail..
What did you think of the figure..?
By the way I do agree, the Armoroma sit is at some times difficult to navigate.
All the Best
Tim R
-- Edited by Tim R at 00:22, 2007-04-26
__________________
"The life given us by nature is short; but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal" -Cicero 106-43BC
Gentlemen, My name is Charles Reading and although I'm a little late to post on this thread I thought I would anyway. I'm the builder of the "Tumbleweed Tank" Dio as seen on Armorama. Thanks for your comments. When I saw the Popular Science cover I thought it begged to be built and when I came across the Andrea figure (whose pose was nearly exact to the magazine) I immediately started planning. Although the finished piece doesn't represent the cover exactly, there were several other artist renderings in the article and each was somewhat different in detail so I used a bit of artistic license on my version. I wanted to be close to 54mm in scale (size of the figure) and I found a clear 4"dia. plastic Christmas ornament at Michael's Craft Store. From there I used Evergreen plastic and bits and pieces of whatever to make the finished model. I'm really glad I have found this site as I have several other WWI diorama ideas (non-fictional) that I am interested in persuading.
Something not unlike the tumbleweed was built in WW2 by the Germans. The only known example sits in a Russian museum somewhere. I've seen a photo and will try and find one if I can persuade my old PC to transfer files.
BTW in the cutaway drawing of the Tumbleweed no one appears to be driving! The man with a steering wheel is busy firing a machine gun (isn't that as dangerous as texting whilst driving ?)
Since this appeared in 1930-odd, doesn't it confirm the old saying about armies always preparing to fight the last war?
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Having loved the Tumbleweed Tank design for sometime - and having downloaded the Popular Science cover and article complete with cut-away drawing - I have one rather BIG question,- look at the width of the exposed portion of the static inner sphere, bearing in mind that the engine plus intake and exhaust are central and to the rear of the vehicle, - how the chuff would you get in?!
Unless the sponsons hinged outwards...
-- Edited by compound eye at 19:42, 2008-09-23
-- Edited by compound eye at 19:43, 2008-09-23
__________________
"You there on the port!". "S'gin actually, but thanks for noticing [hic]".
Having loved the Tumbleweed Tank design for sometime - and having downloaded the Popular Science cover and article complete with cut-away drawing - I have one rather BIG question,- look at the width of the exposed portion of the static inner sphere, bearing in mind that the engine plus intake and exhaust are central and to the rear of the vehicle, - how the chuff would you get in?!
Unless the sponsons hinged outwards...
-- Edited by compound eye at 19:42, 2008-09-23
-- Edited by compound eye at 19:43, 2008-09-23
And even more vital how would you get out in a hurry? Looking at the Kugelpanzer photo how did the driver get in or out. (perhaps they just sealed him in and his dessicated corpse is still in there).
Having loved the Tumbleweed Tank design for sometime - and having downloaded the Popular Science cover and article complete with cut-away drawing - I have one rather BIG question,- look at the width of the exposed portion of the static inner sphere, bearing in mind that the engine plus intake and exhaust are central and to the rear of the vehicle, - how the chuff would you get in?!
Unless the sponsons hinged outwards...
-- Edited by compound eye at 19:42, 2008-09-23
-- Edited by compound eye at 19:43, 2008-09-23
And even more vital how would you get out in a hurry? Looking at the Kugelpanzer photo how did the driver get in or out. (perhaps they just sealed him in and his dessicated corpse is still in there).
Of course, the more plausible explanation is that the Kugel Panzer and Tumbleweed tanks were not crewed by men at all but by teams of extremely talented and dextrous ferrets that could squirm in through the vision ports...
...but then 'driving' is hardly an applicable term for the Kugel Panzer which was about as controllable as an old tractor tyre shoved down a hill, if slighty better armoured.
__________________
"You there on the port!". "S'gin actually, but thanks for noticing [hic]".