Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: French Infantry back on Panzer46.


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
French Infantry back on Panzer46.
Permalink   


Pegasus' site is back up and showing masters for French WWI (and WWII, which are not very different). All very nice. No release date yet.

http://www.panzer46.com/


__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 926
Date:
Permalink   

They are amazing, What scale???.

All the Best
Tim R.

__________________
"The life given us by nature is short; but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal"
-Cicero 106-43BC


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

All 1/72. Excellent news.

__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 825
Date:
Permalink   

Just to add to the confusion W^D will be briging out new sets of French infantry ishortly all are non action figures (as usual)

__________________
Barry John


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

baldwin wrote:

Just to add to the confusion W^D will be briging out new sets of French infantry shortly. All are non action figures (as usual)


Well, we can't have too many.

I've been having a good look at the Pegasus WWII, and there are a few differences but they can be ironed out to create more variety for WWI.

The canteen is different; the WWI have the twin-spout model.

The gas mask is absent.

Some of the WWII have the 1937 pattern webbing with an extra, half-sized ammunition pouch next to the front pair, as in the pic below. That can be trimmed off. I assume that some still have the 1916 pattern because the new pattern hadn't reached all units.

After a prolonged debate, Plastic Soldier review conceded that the absence of the rear ammunition pouch on the HäT WWI Early French is a mistake. It should be there on all WWI French throughout the War. By 1940 it might have been an optional extra, and sometimes used for carrying a pistol, but it is shown in the second pic of the 1937 webbing. Some of the WWII men have the rear pouch, some don't.

The rifle appears to be different. I'm sure someone will know what replaced the Lebel and Berthier, but it's not a major problem. The WWII men don't have bayonets, but those seem to have become less common in the later stages of WWI. The haversack also appears to be somewhat different from the WWI model.

The more Hotchkisses the merrier, obviously. The other machine gun looks like a Chatellerault. It's possible that it could me made to pass for a Chauchat.

If anyone spots any other differences I'd be pleased to hear it. I don't think the Adrian changed outwardly between the Wars. With a bit of fiddling the WWII men can be used to add more variety to the trenches. Perhaps Airfix's poilus are in danger of losing their crown after 42 years.

 



Attachments
__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

Sorry. On closer reading, it turns out that the gasmask isn't missing on the WWII French after all. It's in the greenish bag bottom left in the first picture above - the 1931 model, different from the M2 in the flat container carried by the WWI figures. The M2 was was a combined goggles and facemask issued from Spring 1916 until late 1917, when it was replaced by the ARS, in a cylindrical container and very similar to the German model.

The 31 will just have to pass for an extra haversack.

__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard