Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Landships II -> Landships WW1 Forum -> Softskin vehicles -> A-H Holts - Military or Civil?
Post Info TOPIC: A-H Holts - Military or Civil?
James H


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3886
Date:
A-H Holts - Military or Civil?
Permalink   

Just read a bit of Glanfield again. Acc to him, although the Holt was trialled successfully for the KuK Army, plans for a licence deal were scuppered by the outbreak of war. Does that mean that the Holts used in Belgium etc were all requisitioned civilian vehicles?

There's this strange claim on an American site: "One of the 'Caterpillars' was captured by the British during the early stages of the conflict." I can't see that. They were well away from the BEF in eastern Belgium.

Then this, on the same site: "When the order came from England for a trial tractor, there rested on the docks in New York one of the largest machines that had ever been built. This 'Caterpillar' had been ordered by Franz Joseph of Austria-Hungary for use on one of his estates. It was painted in Franz Joseph's colors and bore his coat-of-arms. War had been declared, and the tractor could not be delivered. So representatives of the Holt company uncrated the tractor, painted out the Austro-Hungarian colors, repainted it a neutral color, and shipped the same vehicle to England."

I've never heard that before.

__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
28juni14


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 815
Date:
Permalink   

.... I've found a good deal of period writings to be quite biased;  if not down right made up.   I think that likely explains the first assertion.

I do know there was indeed a factory in Austria prior to the war( Cat's own records bear this out ).   However,  in the KuK manual I have of traktor, and lorry vehicles; the Holt 45 does not appear.

The last quote is extremely suspect.  The US did not declare war until December 8, 1917,  at which time the  Austro Hungarian Emperor had been quite dead for over a year.  ( Imagine an all-yellow caterpillar. )   The allied blockage had effectively sealed imports by sea anyway.

-- Edited by 28juni14 on Saturday 16th of January 2010 01:07:42 AM

__________________
philthydirtyanimal


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink   

As you say, James, the last snippet seems like a work of fantasy. How many writers have said it was Bullock Creeping Grip, the machines at Greenhithe, Pedrail etc etc.



__________________
In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria.
elbavaro


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 749
Date:
Permalink   

As far as I know there were Austro-Hungarian Forces in Belgium alright after the beginning of the war. It was Heay Artillery - so the Holt was used by them.

__________________
28juni14


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 815
Date:
Permalink   

... yes,  the fortress of  Liege suffered primarily from the fire of the M11 ,  but I have not seen evidence of a Holt in service with any of the KuK batteries.  All photo evidence I've seen shows only the M12 Zugmaschine.  
Incidentally,  these units suffered zero battle casualties,  or equipment losses during the fortress campaigns of August 1914.  

__________________
elbavaro


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 749
Date:
Permalink   

Didn't Vollmer wrote that he saw Austro-Hungarian Holts in action on the Western Front in 1914?

-- Edited by elbavaro on Monday 18th of January 2010 10:01:24 PM

__________________
James H


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3886
Date:
Permalink   

Previous discussion here, with newspaper pic of Holt allegedly in Brussels.

http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=63528&p=3&topicID=13048006

Glanfield says that Lt. Robert Macfie presented a report to Sueter before November 7th 1914 that included "a photograph cut from the Daily Mail that week showing a Holt at work with the German Army."

__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
James H


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3886
Date:
Permalink   

Found (but can't now find again!) a US Army inventory of the KuK, presumably an assessment made at or before the US declaration of war.

It lists ten Holt 75s as being in service. If Jack (28juni14) can't find any listed in the manual he has, that would suggest they were requisitioned rather than already on the strength.

It's most likely that it wasn't (neutral) US policy to stop supplying parts to A-H, just that the Allied blockade made it impossible. There is an interval between the trials and the outbreak of war during which some vehicles could have been assembled from imported parts.

__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Landships II -> Landships WW1 Forum -> Softskin vehicles -> A-H Holts - Military or Civil?
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard