Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Little Willie name


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 531
Date:
Little Willie name
Permalink   


Has anyone see any reference to an official name for Little Willie?

I have seen a comment about wooden mock-ups of the track units fitted to Little Willie, are there any photos?

__________________
ChrisG


The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity (Dorothy Parker)


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 870
Date:
Permalink   

Only "official" name I've seen is here :-   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Willie

-- Edited by Paul Bonnett on Tuesday 12th of October 2010 01:21:38 AM

__________________

 The finest stories of the Great War are those that will never be told.



Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 531
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks Paul, I know it was called  'Number 1 Lincoln Machine'  when it had the Bullock tracks.  I wondered if anyone had seen any refence to an official name when it had the Tritton track.

__________________
ChrisG


The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity (Dorothy Parker)


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 126
Date:
Permalink   

From what I know the Tritton machine was called "No. 1 Lincoln Machine" right from the beginning.
This never changed from the original Bullock built tracks, right through all of Tritton's modifications.

I assume the Landships Committee earlier attempts at track driven vehicles did not have any names.



-- Edited by airdave on Friday 4th of July 2014 12:22:53 AM

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

I raised this a little while ago, but got no response. It's the accepted wisdom that the vehicle was called the "No. 1 Lincoln Machine", but why? I should have thought that, like the Tank Mk I or World War I, it would only become the No. 1 when there was a No. 2 from which it needed to be differentiated. And I've never seen a primary source for the name. Happy to be corrected, as always.

But then there's this: In July 1918, Popular Science Monthly reported, "Because a fellow of the Royal Historical Society has unintentionally misled the British public as to the origin of the famous "tanks," Sir William Tritton, who designed and built them, has published the real story of their nameĀ ... Since it was obviously inadvisable to herald "Little Willie's" reason for existence to the world he was known as the "Instructional Demonstration Unit." "Little Willie's" hull was called in the shop orders a "water carrier for Mesopotamia;" no one knew that the hull was intended to be mounted on a truck." I know that's on Wikipedia, but don't worry - I put it there, in the teeth of the usual opposition, of course, so it's correct.

That is from Tritton himself. No mention of the Lincoln Machine at all. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem possible to identify the misleading member of the RHS. I also think Tritton was being rather pointed in his inclusion of the word "unintentionally."

So is there evidence for the name, and why does Tritton's claim receive so little acknowledgement?



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 126
Date:
Permalink   

agreed...although "No.1 Lincoln Machine" is considerably less descriptive or interesting to a spy (than "Instructional Demonstration Unit.")
I think it sounds like farm implement.
The other name sounds like a Military term and gets me curious.
Generally you'd go for something more cryptic... and Lincoln Machine is definitely more cryptic.

I would argue one thing...
When Tritton was contracted, it was already understood that everyone was working toward the Mk.1
It was already understood that more than one testing vehicle would be built.

Although the name might not have come into existence until the vehicle was presented to the press and public
(which seems like the obvious place to give it an actual name...since the press seem to demand a catchy name for everything)
there was probably an immediate understanding (from the original contract)
that this would be the "Number One machine from the Lincoln factory"

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard