There was a lot of water on the western front, but static as it was not much bridge building, pontoons etc., apart from the early stages I guess. From the Italian/Austrian theatre there are a few more pictures and I think from the eastern front too. To start with the neutrals...a picture of a Dutch pontoon on its carriage, well preserved and giving some itch for a modelling and engineer enthousiast I hope.
Speaking of bridges I have a copy of the Engineer magazine for 1919 in which there is a very detailed article on the Portable Military Bridges;the Inglis System written by Prof.C.E.Inglis (Major,RE,OBE) in which he describes these experimental bridges.Included in the article are a series of photos showing tanks being used. I have posted copies to PDA hopefully he can pass these on on Landships
I've seen pictures of French sappers somewhere working on a very substantial pontoon bridge. Pontoon bridges were used on the Suez canal. Oddly enough, Australian tunnelling companies did a certain amount of bridge-building but those could have been panel bridges I suppose - but memorable because it was under fire (1st and 3rd Tunnelling Companies at various times, late in the war). That is heavy yet precise work - not a lot of fun amid shot and shell, I'm sure.
P.S. The Turkish army group attacking the Suez canal defences in March 1915 hauled assault boats/pontoons across the "burning sands" (many, many miles) to get them into action.
[edit, make that February 1915 - elements of the Turkish VIII Army Corps attempted to project their 75th Infantry Regiment of the 25th Division across the canal at Tussum and Serapeum on 3-4 February, with their 4th and 8th Engineer Battalions rapidly breaching the (massive) canal berms at the two locations and manning the pontoons (as assault craft in the first instance) that they had dragged across the Sinai desert for the crossing. They were repulsed by the Punjab Regiment, the Rajput Rifles and the 2/10 Gurkha Rifles - with a section of the 3rd Field Company, Australian Engineers tucked in there at El Qantara getting involved too - yes the first AIF formation to come under fire (a non-AIF expeditionary force saw action even earlier, against German possessions in the Oceanic region).]
-- Edited by Rectalgia on Saturday 30th of October 2010 06:16:25 AM
two pictures, one again the Neutrals, their 'pontonniers' building a bridge. In Flemish/Dutch speak that's 'een brug slaan'. So much for your Fl.Dutch language lessons. Second picture troops pulling back at Suvla Bay, I presume their 'pontoon' is towed by a ships winch or something or may be a steam launch. By the way, it seems there are more pictures of blown up bridges than newly engineered ones, well I think Steves adagium comes close to that point, as militatry engineering has two sides.
Happy New Year Chris. Thanks for that link - most interesting, passed on to the RAE community locally who will similarly find it informative, I'm sure. I think the RAE Corps history might have a bit of background and further detail about the action at Tussum and Serapeum but unfortunately I've not read it first hand. Good Lord the Corps shop was flogging complete sets (4 volumes) of the histories "on special" recently for about the price of a bottle of añejo tequila - I really must get myself sorted out and buy one.
They were in use before the war. During the war they were motorized Tracted by British Lacre tractors. Unit was known as "Equipages automobiles de pont" gemsco
They were in use before the war. During the war they were motorized Tracted by British Lacre tractors. Unit was known as "Equipages automobiles de pont" gemsco
Hi Gemsco,
during the siege of Antwerp some kind of floating bridge was built on the Schelde river. Who actually constructed that one, the military or was that bridge built by civil engineers?