Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Joseph Hawker Update.


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Joseph Hawker Update.
Permalink   


As reported earlier, I was somewhat taken aback to learn that Joseph Hawker "is generally considered to be the father of the tank." This information features on Wikipedia, of course, and the "citation" is no less than The Chard and Ilminster News.

I expect to receive a copy of the drawings before the end of the week, but have been overtaken by events. A model based on them has been produced and is on display at Chard Museum:

http://www.chardandilminsternews.co.uk/news/chard_news/9263002.Chard_Museum_s_new_model_exhibit/

I think we can relax.




Attachments
__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

 

Hi James looks like a chain drive rather than a "track", with that small wheel it might work as a ploughing engine though on firm ground but I suspect it would get bogged down on anything else.. non to stable looking either, a fairly ordinary three wheeled road engine for the time I think...

 

Cheerssmile



-- Edited by Ironsides on Thursday 22nd of September 2011 09:55:56 PM

__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

I am delighted to announce that a copy of the patent is in my possession, courtesy of the very helpful Somerset Industrial Archaeology Society.

It is an interesting vehicle. The "track shoes" do bear a striking similarity to Tritton's eventual version on Little Willie. Hawker also says that spikes or some other means of increasing grip could be attached to the shoes. On the other hand, it is still a tricycle and would have had no trench-crossing capability. I half-hoped that the forward driving wheels might have incorporated the option of lowering them to form a true caterpillar, in the manner of the Lefebvre types, but they are clearly fixed, so only three wheels could be in contact with the ground.

The two handwheels are ingenious. Each operated a worm-drive, one to alter the direction of the front wheel, and the other to raise or lower it so as to keep the boiler level.

Perhaps the most advanced feature is the differential. It was (or would have been) possible to disengage the drive on one side so as to turn the vehicle (or on both sides to idle).

I think it might deserve a mention in the evolution of the Tank. To say that JH "is generally regarded as the father of the Tank," is insupportable unless you live in Chard, although if enough people cut-and-paste it from Wikipedia it might magically turn out to be true.



Attachments
__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.

Robinson

Date:
CQGGWBpQQwPa
Permalink   


Ab fab my golody man.

__________________
Cayle

Date:
ldIYqEEHACTGd
Permalink   


In awe of that awnser! Really cool!

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard