Making a RC model tank in a larger size would be better but modern technology and smaller electronics, 35th scale would be the smallest to build. On the other hand building a larger model say ¼ scale the you run into weight and power problems etc.
To convert a 35th scale Emhar MkIV tank to RC or any other model, the most important question to ask is can I make the tracks for it or are there tracks available and suitable for RC control, the tracks being the most important part of the RC model.
As with the FT tank the tracks are already made, linked in metal or plastic. The only down side making an RC FT tank is the size, squeezing in the RC components and gearing but it can be done and has been proven. The Emhar 35th scale models have plenty of room inside to fit most bits and bobs. Since I have made my model there are plastic linked tracks available for the MkIV, not sure if they are any good.
I have also contacted Friulmodels to see if they were going to make tracks for the Mk1- IV range, it got to a stage that I even meet up with the guy who runs Friulmodels at Bovington who measured up the tracks including Little Willi and other tank tracks for future production. It looked like Friulmodels were going to put them into production but I have not seen anything yet, maybe you guys should contact them and demand that metal tracks should be produced, the more the merrier as they say, I have done my bit.
As you may already know on another topic I have been making an MkIV Emhar RC tank, its all finished and works a treat to how I expected. It took some working out, trial and error but it was fun and a challenge. I must be one of the few owners in the world who now own a working RC MkIV tank, as the rest of the RC tank world are quite happy with their Tiger tanks (bit of sarcasm there).
How I started was to get the Emhar kit and build the main body but dont fix the side plates on yet as you need to fit the RC bits and gear box etc inside. For the RC for this tank, I robbed another RC model of similar scale, slightly smaller i.e. a Tiger tank which had basic controls, backwards and forwards, there are other models out there, that I was considering and for the FT tank (my next challenge in 35th scale) is an old 56th scale Ripmax Tiger that has rotating turret, a machinegun sounder and a sound gun with light that lights up when fired as well as the standard backward forward controls. These donor models have all you need RC wise and are very small to fit in any Emhar model, even an FT tank. I dont use their motors or gearboxes as I use the Tamiya twin gear box which comes with their own motors. This Gearbox fits perfectly well in the model and runs well on the donor RC batteries, which are rechargeable from the control box, all that is needed is to screw or fix it to the floor of the tank, use the low gear option of the Tamiya gearbox, which you need to build. You need to cut short the two shafts that stick out either side. Dont for get to solder back the two capacitors from the donor model motors to the new gearbox motors as this is to stop interference from the motors to the signals of the RC unit, which I found out the hard way. As for the linkage from the gearbox shafts to the back idler sprockets, I cogged the ends and linked the idler wheels with fine sprocket chain from Motionco Who sold me a foot of plastic chain and 4 of their smallest cogs for £12. The two rear side plates were screwed in place to fit the sprocket set, so dont glue this in, its also used for maintenance. When I first started experimenting I used the original donor motors and run it to the idler wheels at the back with a rubber band, direct drive without a gear box, it didnt work. Gearbox needed, so I used a Tamiya one as mentioned before using the rubber band as drive, then I used an O-ring cut to size and made miniature Vee pulleys, which still caused slippage , so I reverted to gear cogs in the end.
-- Edited by BC312 on Sunday 19th of February 2012 11:17:53 AM
To control the speed to the correct slowness as the Tamiya gear box is slightly fast, I used adjustable resistors fitted on each motor which could be adjusted down to suite.
Now for the track bit, for the tracks to move around the tank hull you need to make running bogie wheels as the Emhar models dont have these, just empty voids. All four idler wheels need replacing in metal to the track design. I made the bottom bogie wheels similar to the original tank and fitted them in a cradle to hold them all in place, the carriage holding the bogie wheels were made to fit in the empty voids and screwed in place. I also made two top bogie wheels so the track as on the original tracks could run up over the roof of the hull. All bogie and idler wheels had shafts made in brass wire at 2mm diameter.
The track itself (see my other topic) were first designed and made in silicone rubber as a continuous band but was eventually made in polyester rubber with a shore hardness of 60 than of 24 in silicone rubber. The silicone rubber stretched too much and was not stiff enough, polyester being the perfect material, I also coloured them in black or any colour to match rusty and mud covered tracks. These bands can be cut to size and re-joined using the same material as the bonding agent, with the join being just as strong as any other part of the track. I used the track mould to align the two joins together. If there were metal tracks available like the Friulmodels tracks for the FT tank then the idler and bogie wheels would be made to suit the track used, you also have to bear in mind the traction of the track and back idler wheels, trouble which I encountered with my design.
The two sponsons are not glued in place but are fixed with 3mm x 2mm magnets bought on eBay, the reason for this is for maintenance and to be able to recharge and switch on the model for use etc.
-- Edited by BC312 on Sunday 19th of February 2012 11:17:19 AM
I started Topic sometime ago hopeing that between the interested parties we could nail the problem of making tracks for the British tanks, and others later, once and for all.
Personaly there should be an RC model section to the forum as other valuable information and ideas are scattered around the site, so a lot of people are repeating topics, unless you can wade through the past pages of info. My original post is miles back, i don't think its seen much.
Tracks are a problem especially in 35th scale but the FT tank tracks in this scale are already sorted by Friulmodels its just the RC bit to deal with. As with the Mk1 to MkV range of models in 35 th scale Friul could make them if they were pestered enough they have the data. That why i made mine as i was at a dead end. In this scale the Mk1 to MkV tracks are fiddly to make. I am surprised that the big modeling companies are not turning out anything.
As with bigger scale, then track making is a bit easier. A master copy can be made and either cast in urithane resin Not the other type (too brittle) or metal cast. you only need a couple of master moulds to be a bit productive in time, making the tracks. The same could apply to the bogie wheels as there are a lot needed to make and are very important to the running of the model. Only one master is needed to be made and in a large scale the track can be made up of parts ie the two track runners (copied from one runner so they are identical) and the track plate and rivets which could be glued on, or if the scale size is big enough the three main parts could be made from masters and assembled like the real thing with rivets.
It would be good to determine what would be the next scale to work with in RC from 1/35 ie 1/25 or better 1/15 as there seems to be too many sizes to play around with 1/20 or 1/18 etc. If there was a stardard size that everyone was happy with then donor bits and other available parts could help make the model easier to build. If i was starting out i would be trying to decided what scale to make it in and if there were motors gearing etc that could suite or even scaled figuers to add to the end result. what would be a popular size? It would be 1/15 for me.
.
-- Edited by BC312 on Sunday 19th of February 2012 01:05:03 PM
-- Edited by BC312 on Sunday 19th of February 2012 01:16:29 PM
What scale to build is a problem, 1/15th seems a useful size if you have room for them. The track is a good size to work with, can be cast in resin, maybe pewter?
There are figures and accessories available for this size
Many thanks Chris for starting this topic and for the info you've given; also to Lincoln T for the FT tracks news (I'll look forward to that).
My view on scale is that 1/15 is a bit out of the blue, and maybe a teensie bit large for the longer tanks. 1/16 is not much smaller to work at, but is the accepted industry scale by Tamiya and Heng Long in their R/C tanks - to me it seems more 'right'.
I accept that most people will want a large r/c tank to be 'large', ie 1/16 or 1/15, rather than a medium-large size like 1/20 or 1/18; these scales I mentioned as a compromise, as when I am in a position time-wise and financially to build, rather than plan out, I might want to attempt anything from a Ford 3 ton up to the proposed MkVIII*. At one end of the spectrum you need a large enough scale to squeeze the electrics in, and at the other you have a long and potentially heavy model that would require a lot of space to store and be surprisingly costly in materials - though of course there is better potential for fitting engine sound modules and exhaust smoke generators (judging by historic footage, the latter would be a must for any large-scale British tank earlier than MkV. "Cough", "splutter"). 1/20 and 1/18 were therefore compromises based on the hope of being able to build not one decent-size r/c model, but a number, of varying size and design. It's purely theoretical at present, because I've got studies to finish and employment to find before I could try building anything.
To tell you the truth i forgot all about 1/16th scale. Yes you are right this would be the ideal scale up from 1/35 for those wanting to build a bigger scale and for those who have space.
As with my ventures with the MkIV, I will post some pictures of my efforts.
For anyone interested in 1/16 or 1/15, I've remembered seeing Heng Long replacement motor/gearbox sets available somewhere for £20. Might be an inexpensive and convenient way to power a tank this size, as long as their gearbox could stand being further geared down by chain drive to the rear sprockets. If anyone is interested, I'll post a link.
Chris - look forward to seeing your project when it's done, do I understand rightly that it's a 1/35 FT?
I have a Heng Long Tiger with sound, the engine goes through a starting sequence and a stopping sequence, the Tiger will be gutted for a 1/15th MarkIV Male.
Figures tend to be 120mm or 1/15th that's why I prefer it over 1/16th.
The 1/16th Russian WW2 tank crew can be modded for British WW1 tank crew though.
__________________
ChrisG
The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity(Dorothy Parker)
Chris, remember that r/c FT with the moving turret and cannon? Maybe you've seen this already, it's the same tank, but painted and driving around a diorama:
Pictures showing the running gear, re-made idler wheels and bogie's, note the Boigie carriage that fits perfectly in the voids where the bogie's originally were.
Hi TinCanTadpole ! I think that is a case of flash photography- - - the colours being distorted by the density of the flash in relation to the distance from the object. Chris - what did you use to make the body etc of your Mk IV, is it plastic card or some other material ? Paul
__________________
The finest stories of the Great War are those that will never be told.
Its an Emhar MkIV kit. I wanted to see if its feasible to make a RC model in this size as there are no RC WW1 tanks on the market. I sure a scratch built version could be made but this is my first effort just to see what can be done in RC. I am sure if Friulmodels knocked out metal tracks. the model would be more real to life.
Chris - have you tried out your tank's trench-crossing performance?
Paul - I'm not sure about the colour, still think it may be olive green. Are you finding this thread helpful re what you'd like to build and how to go about it?
Sounds good; if they do release them and they don't break the bank, an Emhar Tadpole could be tempting. If I were trying something like that, I think I'd follow Helen's suggestion and experiment with drive servos - especially if there any available with planetary gears instead of noisy spur gears!
I emailed Fruilmodels and they replied saying that tracks for the Emhar tanks are planned but cannot say when they will release them. Paul
Thanks Paul for e-mailing them, the more who do, the quicker they will be available because of demand, its also the same if all you WW1 tank or armoured car buffs pester the hell out of other companies like Tamiya and companies that make the bigger stuff to make WW1 models, i always ask model companies at shows. I also wonder about the marketing strategy of the big model companies when they produce an odd model like a inter war Vickers tankett over the iconic MkIV tank that even school children would recognize.
As with my creation, it works a treat crossing obsiticals and its climbing abilities are very good at its slow speed, it performs very well
The idea had crossed my mind to try emailing Tamiya - I made a few of their WW2 kits in the '90s and with the box art and everything I always liked their models. Could always try a 'WW1 tanks of WW2' angle if they're not enthusiasic.
That's very nice Chris, and much quieter in the gearbox than I expected.
I timed your tank; it takes about 9-10 seconds to move it's own length, which looks good for first gear on the real thing, but I think you could actually turn up the juice with the potentiometer, as full speed should mean about 5 secs to cover it's own length (3.7mph = 5' 5" per sec).
Do I hear an engine simulation carried over from the donor Tiger?
The sound is from the donor Tiger. I will have to play around with the speed which is simple to do, not sure what gears were used aproaching a trench in the mud and how these tanks were driven. Driving to fast would plough the tracks in the mud most probaly. Being my first RC model attempt i could incorporate a speed controller for the next model i do.
Does it not have speed control built into the circuit board? It looked in the video like it responded proportionally.
As I understand it, there were only two speeds in the main gearbox. Most of the footage around probably shows tanks being driven in first gear, because the are moving very slowly; second gear seems to have been more respectable, a decent walking pace rather than a casual stroll.
According to the Landships 2 page on the MkV, average speeds were noticeably higher for the MkV than the MkIV, not just because the V had a higher top speed, but because crews apparently tended to drive earlier models in first gear, as they were a pain to handle. I also read in a generic tanks book that the shaft for second gear struggled to cope with the torque applied and tended to twist, so it had to be beefed up for the MkIV.
It's good to see an RC rhomboid in action; have you any thoughts of going for a larger scale at some time?
Now i have built my first, i have some experiance and planning in making my next. Its not easy making one as this model is built on trial and error.
Hopefully those intrested in making an RC WW1 tank can learn and get ideas from here. Anyone like to share their experiances. My next model will be another 1/35 scale model ie the FT tank but i may build it bigger.
I LOVE it! I've always wanted a RC rhomboid, you've shown how it can be done. And I love your youtube test video - you've got to build a diorama with trenches and shell craters and video it going over it! Why not tackle an A7V as your next model? I think the old Tauro 1/35 scale kit's available, you could have tank battles!
Tank battles? Yep, just as long as you have a crater for the A7V to fall into
Must look into how to make circuit boards, see if it's possible to make your own low voltage (3v) radio circuits, and in a small enough size to fit in a 1/35 FT.
I was thinking about this last night, and think that it might be possible to fit hobby-grade RC into a 1/35 FT, but the real problem is the power source; you need 4.8-6v to run hobby-grade radio, but there's precious little space in a 1/35 FT.
The guy who made the RC FT with working suspension (but not turret) that Chris brought to our attention used a CR2 3v lithium battery for power, but you'd need to try to squeeze a second one in if you used hobby-grade gear. This, of course, is assuming I'm right in thinking that micro servos of 0.6-1.0 kg.cm torque are strong enough for the job; the Tamiya twin motor gearbox used by Chris is supposed to produce about 7kg.cm at stall.
Personally, though I like the idea of small scale RC tanks, when I've got the time to have a go (not for a while yet), I think I'll stick to something bigger, even though it means scratchbuilding - which would also be new territory for me (in plastic or plywood).
The A7V would be quite a good tank to convert as you would have the room, may be a good starter kit, not sure what the track detail looks like but would be worth making something similar.
The batteries that run my tank are from the donor tank about 3 volts lithium but very small and would fit in a 1/35 scale tank.
I lathed the bogie wheels, looked a daunting tasks at first but didn't take long to do.
With that boxy hull you're right, you'd have tons of room. Attached are a couple of photos to give an idea of the tracks and running gear (the models are not by me, just stuff I've found on the web).
Paul, as TinCanTadpole said, that gearbox has a single axle and so can't be used for steerable tracks. You may as well get what BC312 used, which is this:
I've seen it for only around £7, so it's not pricey.
As for durable tracks, how about a fine roller-chain with track-plates attached? The pitch of early tank tracks was around 7.5-inches (see attached), or 0.21-inch at 1/35 scale. I've seen roller chain with a pitch of 0.25-inch, so you'd have to make slightly out of scale track-plates but not so bad a casual glance would reveal it.
Extrapolating from my Airfix 1/76 scale Mk I kit, I reckon you need around 49cm of track to go around a 1/35 track frame, or around 1m for a complete vehicle. You can get 5m lengths of 0.25" pitch roller chain here - enough for 5 R/C tanks (or 4 allowing for wastage):
And although £36.80 sounds expensive, you get 5m for that price and it's much cheaper than plastic roller chain of the same pitch. Anyway, just an idea.
-- Edited by Roger Todd on Friday 9th of March 2012 01:35:08 PM