All the Strelets guns are suitable - technically should have a limber, but there's photos showing them not with the limber so not essential. There's a photo of a 6 inch being towed here;
Fantastic! Thank you, Rob! I'm leaning towards using the 8in gun for my Holt. The 6in would look good being pulled by a Fowler steam traction engine, I think.
Thank you for sharing your pictures, Ian!
How's the plastic to work with? Is it very soft...?
Fantastic! Thank you, Rob! I'm leaning towards using the 8in gun for my Holt. The 6in would look good being pulled by a Fowler steam traction engine, I think.
Thank you for sharing your pictures, Ian!
How's the plastic to work with? Is it very soft...?
Hi, it's hard plastic, and easy to work with, but needs a fair bit of cleaning up.
Hi, it's hard plastic, and easy to work with, but needs a fair bit of cleaning up.
Thank you for the information!
I'm used to cleaning up shoddily moulded models, so that won't be a problem (even though it'd be nice not having to do so...). Atleast it's in a workable material.
I finished off the 8 inch Howitzer over the weekend and also painted the crew from the 6 inch gun (set A001).
You should seriously consider sending these photographs to Stretlets. These would undoubtly be used on their site as each set has its own area including any contribution.
These guns - the 6" gun and 8" howitzer were derived from naval guns which used a separate projectile and bagged propellant. The projectile for these guns was too heavy for a single loader to safely lift up to the gun's breech - 45kg for the 6", 91 kg for the 8". So a simple stretcher-type carrier was used so two men could lift the projectile up to the gun's breech. The projectile was then rammed into breech and the propellant bags were pushed in afterwards.
Edit - beaten to the reply - I think it was a lot safer to carry a 6 inch projectile with two men - really don't want a loader tripping over the trail with a fuzed shell. This isn't an issue for naval guns - the projectiles come up via a hoist and the area behind the breech is clear unlike the WW1 guns.
Regards,
Charlie
-- Edited by CharlieC on Tuesday 27th of November 2012 01:33:38 AM
I'm a little surprised that they would need to do it like that for a 6" - I know more about Navy than Army practice, and, at 100-112 lbs, 6" shells were considered manhandleable by a single person. I can see it would be needed for an 8".
Very impressed with the wheels. Will have to pick up the 6 inch cannon set, with a bit of trimming to remove certain items like water bottles, rifles etc the figures will be perfect. Looking forward to the Late war 8 inch howitzer too
On the Strelet forum site tonight there was the following comment to a question I asked
rest assured this range will be expanded in 2013. Right now we are deciding on which cannons shall be released in the next year. You know, that with all the variety of various guns used by all sides, that alone is quite a task. Most likely the ones that we will go for in 2013 are German and French guns.
Now that does make you thing what goodies and suprises will appear! A French 155mm would be the icing on the cake for me
It might be worth giving your three ha'pence worth to Strelets.
Ideally I would like to see the GPF because after making a FT wireless tank from RPM a couple of years ago I would not like repeat the experience! However I would be equally happy with the Canon de 155C modele 1917 Schneider.
Ideally I would like to see the GPF because after making a FT wireless tank from RPM a couple of years ago I would not like repeat the experience! However I would be equally happy with the Canon de 155C modele 1917 Schneider.
This is one gun I hope Hät will do as I think they will do it better and you'll get more guns for your bucks, seems theres little difference to the 155mm modele 1915 Schneider other then the method of loading.