Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Mark IV female (1/35, Takom)


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Mark IV female (1/35, Takom)
Permalink   


Hello,

 

today I got a Mark IV female from Takom in 1/35:

 

 

The first step was to check its accuracy. I compared it to the data in the original drawings EOC 22097 20295 (Hull Details - Interior)

and EOC 22098 20296 (Details of hull - Exterior) as well as numerous photographs. I found the following:

 

+ Size and shape of the hull plates is spot on

+ Most nuts and bolts are correct in number and position

+ Track is accurate

 

- A few nuts, mostly at the front, are positioned incorrectly. I will correct them and show it here as I go.

- The suspension access holes on the inside of the suspension housings are open but should be covered by plates

- MP-holes are all molded closed (I will follow Pierantonio's method to open some of them)

- Sponsons can not be modeled in transport configuration

 

I am very pleased with the kit. As a lot of people citisize the tracks, I chose to start with them. I invested 2.5 hours today to build a

track segment of 40 links without a problem. Here is the result:

 

 

 

It moves very freely. One could invest even more time to build it cleaner, but I will depict a tank in running condition, leaving only

limited view to the track insides. I must say that I like the track a lot more than a Dragon DS track. Even if it needs a lot of time, you

get much more value than with vinyl or even the new Tamiya tracks, and all detail you need to depict a loose track of a damaged tank.

No aftermarket needed.

 

Best regards,

Thorsten

 



__________________


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 117
Date:
Permalink   

Excellent start ,

__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 150
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Thorsten,

PPMS has now a full preview of these kits

http://www.perthmilitarymodelling.com/reviews/vehicles/takom/takom2008-9.html

they also confirm my first impression on top hatch dimension.

Bye

Pierantonio



__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 244
Date:
Permalink   

Please do tell us how many track links you end up building for each side. Tamiya says 87 & Takom say 92, whereas a 'perfect' factory fresh real tank should theoretically have 90 links.

Also, it would be good to know which idler setting you use, for the number of track links. Apparently the kit has 3 positions for fitting the idler far back into the track horn, midway, or poking out infront of the track horn.

Also, did you get proper Flirt decals in your Female? I got Male decals in my Female kit!



__________________
"You there on the port!". "S'gin actually, but thanks for noticing [hic]".


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

I'll keep you updated. Today I seperated all track parts from the sprues and assembled another 80 links, hopefully tomorrow I will be able to show the finished tracks.

And yes, I got the correct decal sheet...

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 244
Date:
Permalink   

Cool!

To my mind, the clean up is probably going to be harder than the building. Although PMMS did say they found it difficult to keep the tracks straight & even.

Decals are not really a prob for me, as I fancy a pre-issue training / or early battle tank with huge numbers and no unditching rails, instead of the kit choices, but it is interesting to see who got what in their box.

__________________
"You there on the port!". "S'gin actually, but thanks for noticing [hic]".


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Well I only clean up the parts B1 prior to assembly. Instead, I cut B2-5 as close to the part as possible, to get a ok-ish glue edge to B1. Then I glue them together, and when it's not dry to 100% yet, I snap them together and try to correct misalignments. I also plan to sand the surface built up from B2-5 when all links are finished, but I am not trying to have it perfect on the invisible inside as I'm building an intact tank.

I'm not yet sure which tank I will depict. I'm thinking about either Flirt II at training or a tank with the number 2544 which is seen on at least two pictures. Deborah would be my first choice, but I have no picture of it prior to its destruction.

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 244
Date:
Permalink   

I was thinking of only cleaning the contact surfaces also, and then taking an emery board to the outer faces of b2+5 once all assembled and linked.

However. Any further build input will be post welcome to see. Esp, as I would like to understand the link number versus idler position.

__________________
"You there on the port!". "S'gin actually, but thanks for noticing [hic]".


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

I have now 160 links completed and will build another 30 tonight, so I'll have enough for the tank tomorrow. I've also tested the sanding-after-linking idea, and it works like a charm. I'll post pictures tomorrow. Then I'll also start with the rest of the tank.

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Hello,

 

yesterday I completed the tracks and today I started with the hull.

First I decided to use Pierantonio's way of replicating the pistol port flaps and periscopes for further use:

 

Now I will relocate the wrong rivet detail and remove some of the molded-on pistol ports.

 

Regards,

Thorsten

 



__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

I have now corrected the wrong rivet details:





And I opened three pistol ports:



Regards,
Thorsten



-- Edited by thorst on Sunday 7th of September 2014 05:20:14 PM

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Another Update for today:

 

Two more rows of rivets on each side of the driver housing had to be corrected (flattened):


Then I glued together the plates for the hull:


And everything assembled with tape:


A first view with the track:


These are 88 links, but no wheels are mounted until now, and the track is very tight. I hope that with the wheels, 90 links will fit nicely.

I did not yet encounter any fit problems, except for some flash which had to be removed on the mould lines.


Regards,
Thorsten



__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 213
Date:
Permalink   

Has anyone tried the Friulmodel tracks.

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 244
Date:
Permalink   

This is interesting work. 88 links with no running gear, just the track frames... I do hope you get a perfect 90 links with everything in place.

I know it is a bit pedantic, but I should be delighted to hit a perfect 90 and have 15 evenly spaced grousers - even though they were often very randomly fitted in reality.

__________________
"You there on the port!". "S'gin actually, but thanks for noticing [hic]".


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

I hope so, too, but 89 would also be fine with me. Although I think that there is enough possibility to get the track tighter by glueing the links together in the end. It does have a lot of elasticity.

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 244
Date:
Permalink   

I should be intrigued to know which idler setting you end up using. Racked right in, intermediate 1, intermediate 2 or racked right out.

Not that I think of you as a guinea-pig by any means, but shared knowledge and experience of this kit is going to be pure gold for other modellers.

Did you spot that you have to shave back a lot of the rivets to fit the escape doors under the female sponsons?

My personal research - when I get to building - will be on the idea of modelling male [actually SUPPLY] sponsons stowed inboard, since it looks like this could be achieved by cutting back the mounting lips around the hull apertures. The hull apertures even have internal rivet detail, for anyone looking to model inboard sponsons during transport or marshalling.



-- Edited by compound eye on Monday 8th of September 2014 01:49:38 PM

__________________
"You there on the port!". "S'gin actually, but thanks for noticing [hic]".


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

I think that all positions can be modeled because of the elasticity of the tracks. But I'll keep you updated.

I didn't have a look yet on the sponsons, so I can't comment on this yet, sorry.

Yes, there is a fir amount of internal detail present. However, in reality, there are holes and cutouts in the plates which are represented by parts E8, E9, E10 and E11. If you have access to it, take a look at the drawings in the Haynes Owner's Workshop Manual, the cutouts are at least partially marked there. They would be visible if you model the sponsons in stowed position I think.

I hope that my build-thread shows in the end where easy modifications (like the rivet relocation and modifications) can be made, and if there are more problematic areas. I just hope that I don't oversee errors...

Best regards,
Thorsten

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Hello,

 

a small Update: Yesterday I glued on most of the details on the hull. Also, I made molds from the commander's and driver's visor flaps and poured them from resin, an Update will follow. The same I did for the track adjustion screws.

 

Then I started with the assembly of the sections. Other than in the instructions, I first glued on the inner plates to prevent misalignment:



Then the wheels were put in.

Here, two more errors in the kit surfaced: The bottom rollers should be without the holes (heavy type), and the single wheel on top of the back should have the flanges like on my render:

Then I assembled the outer armor plates, and put on the tracks for testing:



The idler wheel is placed in the position mid-forward, and the tracks have 90 links. They are a bit loose but will look fine when glued on.

I hope to get the assembly finished today.

Thorsten



__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

I won't make it completely today. Only PE parts and sponsons are missing, but I don't want to rush it. I will post the next update until next weekend, when the build is finished.

Thorsten

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Hello,

a quick question: On the inner horns, closely behind the petrol tank, there is an open hole on each side (perhaps for the inspection of the drive wheel gear). Were these covered in combat? Lodestar III and Liberty have a round plate on them, but I'm unable to confirm this with contemporary photos.

Thorsten

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Noone?

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Hello,

some progress. The tank is ready for primer.

Here are the remaining changes I made to the kit:

The upper hatch was increased in size by adding 0.5mm plastic card, and a pistol port was added on its side which was missing on the kit:

Here is the result of my modifications to the commander's and driver's flaps:

The maintainance openings on the inside of the suspension housings were closed with 0.25mm plastic card:


The current state:


I hope that the weather allows me to prime it today...

 

Regards,
Thorsten



__________________


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:
Permalink   

Good job, Thorst.
It will be very useful.

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Thank you!

I had to make some modifications to represent Flirt II at Wailly which I will not cover here due to the use of unpublished material. But everything is fine now, and I started with the base and put on the brown color. Here is a picture sequence of the building of the base:


Unfortunately the decals of the kit are too large compared to the real photos, so I will mask the markings and use the airbrush.

Regards,
Thorsten



-- Edited by thorst on Wednesday 1st of October 2014 05:58:11 PM

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

And another update:

Because the decals of the kit are too large, I masked the markings "F.4" and "FLIRT II" and painted them in white using the airbrush. Afterwards, I painted the playing card emblem to the sides by hand and a fine brush. To finish the initial painting, I sealed everything with a german Future-equivalent (Bims Vollglanz). Here are some pictures:











Cheers,
Thorsten



-- Edited by thorst on Wednesday 1st of October 2014 10:17:26 PM



-- Edited by thorst on Wednesday 1st of October 2014 10:18:19 PM

__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Love it!
BTW, I have been studying the rear armored panels, and I've never seen the small square device prortuing at the rear, with the "handle" (that you added in brass sheet). What is that?
D.

__________________


Lieutenant

Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Date:
Permalink   

there are photos showing the "small square device" on the HMLS Excellent photo set on the main site but this is not on the rear armour panels but on the rear of the tank but in the same approximate position

 



-- Edited by Druid_Ian on Friday 3rd of October 2014 12:34:00 AM

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Hello,

 

I can't comment on the modifications as explained above. But you can see the plate for example on page 39 in the Haynes book.

 

In the meantime, the model is finished. The base is based on these photographs:

http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205227571

http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205239109

Here is the finished model:





















The base color comes much darker in these pictures than with the naked eye.

 

I was really happy with the kit, it must be one of the most accurate model kits I've ever built. Well worth the money.

 

I hope you enjoy the pictures.

 

Best regards,
Thorsten



__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

BTW, I used exactly 90 track links on each side and everything worked fine when glued together.

__________________
m83


Sergeant

Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Date:
Permalink   

I have really enjoyed following this thread thorst, superb work.
Beautiful model, thankyou for sharing the progressin of your work.

regards Kev

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Thank you Kev.

__________________
MRG


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 121
Date:
Permalink   

Very nice build, great display! Thank you for sharing the report!

 

Best regards,

Martin



__________________


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 628
Date:
Permalink   

Awesome!



__________________


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 6
Date:
Permalink   

Excuse my ignorance but what are original drawings EOC 22097 20295 and EOC 22098 20296? Any links where I can find these plans?

__________________


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink   

Thank you!

Buster95: You can find these drawings for example in the Haynes Owner's Workshop manual about the Mark IV.

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 433
Date:
Permalink   

Wonderful work on the model!
Your improvements are very well done!
I've built it too, but was a bit disgusted with the tracks I eventually built mostly without the connectors, just adding plastic card to obtain a correct space between the frames and the links.

Regards
Gilles(Lostiznaos)

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard