"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Never seen before. - But obviously taken from some kind of publication. So, not really 'new', rather forgotten.
Well, "already existing but seen, experienced, or acquired recently or now for the first time."
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
The photo is from The Official History of the New Zealand Rifle Brigade, so I assume it's kosher. AFAIK Hagen was captured by British troops.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Both 504 "Schnuck" and 528 "Hagen" were captured by the 1st Bn, Canterbury Regiment, New Zealand Division, on September 2nd, 1918. - But taking into account the itinerary of the NZ Div - and the fact that capture date and time of salvage might lie weeks apart, the picture could also show 540 - or even good old 562 "Herkules"...
-- Edited by mad zeppelin on Saturday 8th of August 2015 10:06:09 AM
Both 504 "Schnuck" and 528 "Hagen" were captured by the 1st Bn, Canterbury Regiment, New Zealand Division, on September 2nd, 1918. - But taking into account the itinerary of the NZ Div - and the fact that capture date and time of salvage might lie weeks apart, the picture could also show 540 - or even good old 562 "Herkules"...
OK, then. "An already existing but seen, experienced, or acquired recently or now for the first time photograph of what the caption says is Schnuck but might equally be Hagen, unnamed chassis 540, or possibly even Herkules."
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Interesting post in that forum (The British& CommonwealthMilitary Bagde Forum). Of particular note is that the name "Schnuck" is first mentioned by forum member "atillathenunns". It isn't mentioned so in the NZETC source! For me, the whole scenery looks quite the same as in the Hundleby/Strasheims book, page 142 with "Hagen". And yes, I always hoped to find a photo of 540's recovery, but this one appears highly speculative...
__________________
"Siplicity is the ultimate sophistication" -Leonardo Da Vinci-
This is what I found in the New Zealand National Library (there's no digital image):
Captured German tank being towed from battlefield by British tank
Date: 7 September 1918
Ref: PA1-f-092-1205
A German tank captured by Allied forces being towed at Fremicourt, France, by a British tank. Photograph taken 7 September 1918 by Henry Armytage Sanders.
Inscriptions: Inscribed - Album page - beneath image: H.1205. Victor and vanquished. A German tank being towed by one of our tanks from the battlefield. Photographer's title on negative -bottom right: H1205.
This is possibly the tank captured by New Zealand forces and named "Hagen".
Quantity: 1 b&w original photographic print(s).
Physical Description: Gelatin silver print 11.3 x 15.9 cm, mounted on album page