2016 will make the 100th aniversery of the stalhelm.
So next I will mark this with a possible line of 1/18th figures planes and yes armor.
My plan is to start with the A7V
As most of you know most making and come were done in the field and were not too symmetrical . Should this be carried out or do you think it I can take a little artisticle licsens and make them symeticle ?
Too bad I can not find my spell check.
-- Edited by Pickelhauben on Wednesday 19th of August 2015 04:36:11 AM
Doing my best is not the issue ( other than spelling )
I am sure the hard core collector would want the markings historicly correct , but would the average collector want the markings to look at least even ?
I would have thought that H & S drawings backed up wherever by photos showing the pattern would be as definitive as you will ever get: anybody who wants to argue those sources would have to have some really serious irrefutable reference material that hasn't seen the light of day before now.
I would have thought the biggest problem would be the colour of the German Field Grey!
As there were so few of these tanks built then accurate markings I think, because there really isnt much room for the modeller to be creative and move away from that very limited number.
With mass produced WW2 tanks for example symetrical markings are much better and allow the modeller to depict a nachine not in the decals provided specifically with the kit.
But what are accurate markings? Certainly those from a photo would be spot on. But we all know that markings change on a given vehicle over time, so any number of variations could be acceptable. Of course there will always be those who insist that there's only one way is correct (theirs)! We must accent these rants for what they are . . . nonsense!