There's probably lots missing Ned. We don't even have complete lists of tanks in each unit in the Great War.
Whether we know of them depends on three things:
1. Whether anyone made a record of them at the time;
2. Whether that record survived;
3. Whether that record can now be found.
Well there are, but the records tend to be fragmentary. You get a number here, a number there, but rarely a list of all the tanks in one place at one time.
If you can get it, there's a book called "A Somewhat Unusual Journey" by Major H.S. Sayer. The original came with a CD of documents. It's about Sayer's experiences with the South Russia detachment and whilst it doesn't contain a complete list it does give some serial numbers. A quick flick through gives me 9009, which isn't on your list. I have also been fortunate to get in touch with relatives of men who were attached to these units and who have been able to provide some information. But as I say, if you're interested in this you have to be prepared to work from very many individual sources and assemble information from lots and lots of tiny snippets. (It's what I do!)
I am a little suspicious about the accuracy of the list, a copy of which you have posted. I am particularly interested in the Medium A's. The list shows 242 and 245 being in Russia. I believe that is wrong and should be 342 and 345. Otherwise I agree with the other numbers.
I am a little suspicious about the accuracy of the list, a copy of which you have posted. I am particularly interested in the Medium A's. The list shows 242 and 245 being in Russia. I believe that is wrong and should be 342 and 345. Otherwise I agree with the other numbers.
Tanks3 .
I agree. 342 and 345 were definitely in Russia. 242 I suspect went to Ireland though I can't prove it. I have no knowledge of 245's service history.
The Osprey books on Russian Civil War armor have the White Armies in South Russia getting 73 or 74 tanks. Mk V and Whippets. The Reds captured :
South Russia 56 MkV and 17 Whippets
Archangel Meduim B 1613 and Mk V 9085
Georgia 2 Mk Vs could be nos 9146 and 9330
Oh, they did. I have a print taken directly from a Canadian photograph of captured German transport in 1918. (The print is stamped on the back, identifying the source.)9 The vehicle manufacturer's plate is visible, and legible under magnification. Glass plate negatives an silver nitrate ho;d a lot of information, but it is unfortunate that we usually see images in a degraded form.
The David Fletcher book "Medium MK A Whippet" has the Whippets captured by the Reds being used against the Poles, the Japanese and internal rebellions. They were operational until 1922. The book has the Medium B seeing little service with the RKKA.
In the book TANKS IN THE CIVIL WAR by Maxim Kolomiets, he shows various pictures of the Mk A , I'm putting together a list of what happened to some of them.
Since the Soviets didn't start making tanks until 1927 I would say they would repair any tank they could get their hands on and repair it. They had a number of former White army tank crewmen who either defected or were taken prisoner and let out of the camps to operate these tanks.
The above osprey books says of the tanks not all were operational a few were battle scared hulks and several needed extensive repair. The 2 tanks in Georgia were in bad repair. Audacious # 9168 and 7 others were captured at Sevastopol on 20 nov 1920 9168 was "holed and burned. The tanks were repaired at Kharkov in 1920 and Moscow in 1921. The 3rd TR had 19 Mk Vs until 1930. In 1931 they were sent to depots schools and firing ranges ect. In 1938 the last were sent to museums or bombing ranges.
There is a running example in the 1930s movie We Are From Kronsdadt.
In the book "Churchil'ls Secret war with Lenin" by Damien Wright
It has Mk V 9303 as the one on display at Archangel it has the MG sponson on the left side.
some errata for the book:
page 296-7 has Medium A tanks in North Russia where only Mk V and medium Bs were sent
Page 398 has a Medium B with Denikin in South Russia when he never received any
page 423 Has aircraft being crushed in crates by a tank at the evacuation of Ekateridor according to the book "Gone to Russia to Fight" the only account that mentions this is "Last Train Over Rostov Bridge" which is a very heavily fictionalized memoirs by M Aten
non armor errata:
Page 294 He calls HMS Fox a Battleship it is a cruiser
page 307 he has the Russian Battleship Petropavlsk being hit by CMBs during the Kronstadt Raid in 1919. The British have claimed this since 1919 and every account since this repeats this in part they didn't have access to Russian records until the book "Russian and Soviet Battleships" which says the torpedos ran under the ship and hit the quay and the battleship was undamaged.
page 344 the German submarine U 13 was lost cause unknown or hit a mine it was not rammed by the Battleship Zealandia see uboat.net
page 383 the aircraft in the center of the picture is a HF 30
page 415 the author can't understand that pilots and others make false ect claims
page 424 Raymond Collishaw was not in command of the RAF in the desert during El Alemain in 1942. He was in command of the RAF in the Desertt in the 1940-41 period