In this category because the Airfix Germans got me thinking.
Several of the poses (lying firing, kneeling firing, swinging rifle, clubbing with rifle butt, Bangalore Torpedo) have Y-shaped webbing. The standing firing bloke has a cross-over arrangement at the rear.
The trouble is that although I know Y-straps were standard in WWII, I can't find any evidence of them in The Great War.
Acc to various references, the belt was the location of most of the infantryman's accoutrements (entrenching tool, bayonet, ammo pouches, breadbag, and canteen) and was partially supported by hooks sewn into the Waffenrock (as was the practice in the British and Belgian Infantry). The M1895 pack had straps that could be attached to the belt at the front to support the weight of the pouches but was otherwise completely separate. I've also seen photos of German troops with a strap that ran round the back of the neck (like the Italian kit) to support the pouches, but I can't find any mention of Y-straps. AFAIK only the French and Serbs had them, largely because of their dorsal ammunition pouch. There doesn't seem to be any explanation for the crossed straps on the standing rifleman.
Have I spotted a mistake 40 years too late? I'm happy to be enlightened, as always.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Ah. If I understand this correctly, it would seem that the Koppeltraggestell (belt support braces) was issued in 1934.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
There I was, happy with my 45 year old Airfix Germans.
Now did the Germans wear Y-straps / Koppeltragegestelle in WW1?
I looked through the Osprey and some other books on the matter as well ashttp://www.landships.freeservers.com/german_earlywar_uniforms.htm but would you think I could find one image clearly showing Y straps? I didn't.
sells reproductions and has some interesting details on the real thing's introduction: "In WW1 Y straps were originally worn only by the Cavalry. It was planned that in the Infantry the belt was to be held up by the 1895 pack. As the war progressed Y straps were more widely issued and were worn by Pioneers, Storm Troopers and Assault Troops." This must be, however, read in the context of the author's wish to sell many of them, and references would be more than welcome.
This article on the Koppeltragegestell's introduction makes no mention of WW1:
http://www.mp44.nl/equipment/y_belt.htm
The two broad leather straps very commonly seen on WW1 German infantrymen between ammo pouches and the shoulder straps seem to be the rucksack's straps.
Most interesting. The Strelets Dragoons, Cuirassiers, and Hussars have Y-straps, which PSR describes as "the normal cavalry version", whereas the Uhlans don't have any straps at all. I think the absence must be an oversight. I have managed to find a pic of an Uhlan apparently wearing the Koppeltraggestell. So it looks as if the cavalry theory is correct.
As regards infantry, Stephen Bull and Mollo & Turner make no mention of it. Pic 2 & 3 are from M&T, showing the 1895 pack, and no strap is visible. But in SB's book there are a couple of pics of early 1916 Stormtroopers wearing the assault pack on what looks very much like a Y-strap. Notice that they're still wearing the Pickelhaube, minus spike.
There are also pics of the 1895 pouches worn with the strap that goes round the back of the neck, some in which it's impossible to tell where the straps go to, and one in which a man seems to be wearing two sets of straps, destination unknown.
I'm not absolutely clear about every aspect of this, but it does seem that the Y-strap is probably not correct for infantry during the period represented by the Airfix Germans.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Infantrymen's belt pouches were held up by the back pack straps. The cavalry Y straps were not an issue item. After discarding pack packs for static line duty, the belt pouches were most often supported by bread bag straps wrapped around the neck. This was a common field expedient.
Jack seems to be right about the infantry. Further scrutiny reveals that the assault pack was constructed by using an assortment of breadbag- and other straps and wasn't on a Y-strap. L&F Funcken, who are very reliable but not infallible, show a colour sketch of a stormtrooper with a Y-strap but it's not conclusive. The Osprey book on Stormtroopers has lots of colour plates showing Y-straps, but none of the actual contemporary photographs shows any at all.
However, the Cavalry version does seem to have existed. If it wasn't issue, where did it come from?
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
As clarification; the " Y " strap was standard WW1 Cavalry issue, but not infantry. They becamee infantry issue in the mid 30's after the adaptation of the smaller cavalry ammunition pouches.
It's worse than I thought. The crawling figure and the mg crew have Y-straps as well.
And I was wrong about the Serbs. It looks as if only the French had such an item in the War.
-- Edited by James H on Sunday 5th of June 2011 10:16:45 PM
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Well, the GWA in the United states doesn't mention anything about Y straps. Many individual re-enactment groups have there own regs. Here's all I could find, you will note that this particular item is listed under REQUIRED UNIFORM AND EQUIPMENT GUIDELINES. http://www.jr459.org/uniform_8.htm
Honestly I'm shocked. I personally never cared before, because I, like the majority just believed that many things on issue in WWII were mostly carried over from the Great War. I mean, being that I am putting together a general representation of a WWI German army Corps, so many of the troops I've collected have these molded already, and I have no other choice but to paint them. Now that we've mentioned that, It also bothers me that so many sets are currently being minted with Y straps and you would think the model makers would catch on. Its like Panzergrau & Feldgrau all over again. But, since their the only sets available I have to take what I can get.
Greetings, Josh
P.S It wouldn't also be my Airfix troops that triggered this thread would it?.
-- Edited by FR73 on Monday 6th of June 2011 06:17:31 AM
-- Edited by FR73 on Monday 6th of June 2011 06:18:16 AM
-- Edited by FR73 on Monday 6th of June 2011 06:18:56 AM
__________________
"General, you have nobly protected your forts. Keep your sword...to have crossed swords with you has been an honor, sir." General der Infantrie, Otto von Emmich
FR73 wrote:P.S It wouldn't also be my Airfix troops that triggered this thread would it?.
Sorry, Josh. Nothing personal. I can't remember why I started thinking about it now. The box illustration doesn't show them (although there are other differences as well)
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
The Osprey book about WW1 "Armies in the Balkans" shows a plate of another German specialist wearing Y-straps. It is a member of Rommel's Württemberg Mountain Battaillon in October 1916. The relevant text mentions "infantry support Y-straps".
Pavlovic is a vastly superior artist to some of the others Osprey commissions, but he did not work from a period photograph for that particular illustration. Unless this corporal liberated the braces from a cavalry depot, this excellent drawing carries an error in detail.
The M1895 Tornister, or back-pack, had the braces permanently attached. When it was taken off, the heavy ammunition pouches were without support and produced a distinct "sag" on the waist belt. The bread-bag straps were an immediate solution for troops in line as they were light weight and simply wrapped arond the neck to render the necessary support to those heavy pouches.
German Army doctrine preaches Decisiveness, so, to make a decision, I would say Y straps are worn, but not on the outside of the uniform. I see it as a matter of personal choice, as there were many non reg items found on German troops in WWI. Just look at how many "non establishment" stormtroop formations wore mountain gear, or how many different variations there were on "Full marching order". Also, since I failed to touch on this in my last post, the cross straps are an error, for expedient purposes I guess airfix sculpted the standing rifle man along the lines of a G.I. I picked up on that right away too when formed the X. Korps 2 years ago.
Greetings, Josh
-- Edited by FR73 on Monday 6th of June 2011 09:55:54 PM
__________________
"General, you have nobly protected your forts. Keep your sword...to have crossed swords with you has been an honor, sir." General der Infantrie, Otto von Emmich
That seems a curious conclusion to draw, Josh, if you don't mind my saying so. They certainly wore braces (suspenders in US), but I can't imagine why they would wear Y-straps under the tunic.
In the cavalry, the only purpose of the Y-strap would be to support the ammo pouches and possibly the bayonet on the belt. Everything else would be on the horse, with no pack necessary. Therefore the item wouldn't be designed to take a pack, so I don't see what advantage there would be in an infantryman adopting it.
But acc to the Funckens, Uhlans and Cuirassiers were converted to what was essentially mounted infantry from 1916 onwards and had their own assault companies. It seems likely that they would have retained their Y-straps, which might explain the confusion.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
No its fine James, I can say that whatever advantage the Germans thought Y straps possesed in WWII may have also been true in WWI. I just find the idea of all these years of soldier making with such an obvious error mind boggling. It absolutely unravels the thread of everything I thought to be historically true about His Majesties Army. As I look back through my own Osprey books, (And I have alot, nearly every title on WWI Germany produced to date.) I also notice there is no reference made to Y straps on infantry. But like I said before, what can I do? they'd look terrible if I filed off all those Y straps. Oh well, Like I said when I started this hobby, a wise Sous chef told me, "It doesn't have to be spot on every time, It just needs to be a general representation of what you are trying to do" but please, When will someone produce a set of WWI German engineers so I can pawn off these WW2 Revells!
Greetings, Josh
-- Edited by FR73 on Wednesday 8th of June 2011 07:34:52 AM
__________________
"General, you have nobly protected your forts. Keep your sword...to have crossed swords with you has been an honor, sir." General der Infantrie, Otto von Emmich
They're rather hard to make out, but one or two of the Strelets Stormtroops have Y-straps. as well, including the bloke who is, rather implausibly, not only carrying an 08/15 but also wearing body armour. He can't have been very light on his feet.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Well the figures in HäT's German Heavy Weapons set have no Y-straps. But they are awful.
Their artillery crew figures haven't either, as they hardly wear any webbing at all.
Their German Jäeger and Infantry figures probably have them, but as they are wearing full pack it is hard to see anyway. The kneeling loading figure in the infantry set seems to wear a set of Y-straps, though: http://www.hat.com/Othr7/Sander60P.html
His Majesty The Kaiser may hold (Or wear) the answer Himself!
Greetings, Josh
__________________
"General, you have nobly protected your forts. Keep your sword...to have crossed swords with you has been an honor, sir." General der Infantrie, Otto von Emmich
I think it likely the Kaiser would wear cavalry equipment hence the straps...
so does that mean the Airfix infantry are good for dismounted cavalry? I always thought their rifles were more like carbines...
Cheers
Hmmm. Even with the spike removed, that puts them in 1915 and and '16. Haven't been able to find out much about the transition but the Funckens show the following:
1, 2, and 3; Uhlans of assault section, 1916-18: 4; Cuirassier in assault order, 1916-18.
and a Jäger zu Pferd 1917-18 in what looks like 1914 uniform but with Stahlhelm.
The text says, "During approach marches Cavalry carried the carbine slung across the back, which on the one hand offered protection against sabre strokes and also prepared them for eventual combat on foot. The changes in the type of fighting after the first few months of the War were fatal to the German Cavalry, who had to resign themselves to sharing the same lot as their brothers-in-arms in the Infantry."
Don't know enough about this aspect to be certain.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
This is not helpful at all. According to the captions: on the left, trooper of the German Assault Battalion Rohr, Sept/Oct, 1916; on the right, A-H Assault Troops training on the Italian Front.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
This turned up in a WW1 French uniform search. The guy on the right has the nipples on his helmet, but it looks suspiciously WW2ish to me. But anyway, I remembered this thread about German straps, and thought it might be of interest:
I think 30s. There are some similar pics in German Trench Mortars and Infantry Mortars 1914-45 by Wolfgang Fleischer. Note the boots and the scutcheons on the helmets.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
The gear of the German to the right might have been misinterpreted by the sculptor. At least one of the Frenchmen's pose is not too dissimilar to the one of one Airfix figure.