Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: "Vehicles" at Gallipoli.


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
"Vehicles" at Gallipoli.
Permalink   


Acc to Martin Gilbert's First World War, the Allies evacuated 1,718 "vehicles" and 186 heavy guns from Gallipoli, and left 1,590 "vehicles" behind. I'm surprised by these large numbers. I've always thought of it as being an extremely crowded place with not much call (or room) for such a transport fleet.

Presumably the numbers include wagons and maybe limbers. Does anyone happen to know know what else might have come under that heading? Were the armoured cars evacuated or were any left behind?



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 187
Date:
Permalink   

I seem to recall seeing a photograph of a traction engine at Gallipoli... Also, the preserved Albion now restored in a Turkish museum is said to have originated there.



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

Hi james Im sure that whats meant by this is horse or hand drawn vehicles...

From "Uncensored letters from the Dardanelles"...

may 15

"The weather is hot. I had a heavy siesta in the tent.
The colours one sees to-day are admirable. The plain is
a swarm of men, horses, guns, munitions, and provision
cases ! The sea is of the bluest blue, and black ships are

lying on it battleships. A huge fountain of water rises
now and then. It is a " marmite " which has fallen into
the sea. Friendly aeroplanes fly over us unceasingly."

may 31

"Sedd-el-Bahr or Sedoul Bahr is the landing point where
the English and French were so admirable, and lost so
many men. It is ruined done for. There are only
soldiers, munitions, horses, material no women."

"The narrow streets of the town are filled with soldiers
of every service, crowded with carts, munition cases,
ambulance carriages, horses, artillery waggons. One must
squeeze up against the wall under the toppling roofs not
to be crushed by them. Heaps of soldiers have occupied
the ruins and are camping there."

 

Cheerssmile



__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

Thank you for responses so far, Citizens.

I know we don't do aircraft here, but Ironsides's mention of them prompted me to look into their use at Gallipoli. This remarkable claim is made here: "Kitchener denied Hamilton air reconnaissance prior to the landing." Extraordinary.

Should anyone be interested, this impressive site appears to be a thorough account of how aircraft were used during the campaign.



-- Edited by James H on Wednesday 3rd of August 2011 06:03:40 PM

__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

from the Turkish perspective...

http://www.turkeyswar.com/aviation/airop.htm

 

Cheerssmile

 



__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 

Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

Motorcycles would also have come under that heading

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham

Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

I found a bit more about motor vehicles at Gallipoli - I visited the battlefield last year and wondered if any motor vehicles, apart from the motorcycles and RNAS Rolls Royce armoured cars, served there. According to The Royal Army Service Corps' by Col. R H Beadon;

" it was there alone on the peninsula (at Suvla), except for a few four-wheel-drive lorries for the artillery at Helles, that mechanical transport was employed a detachment of twenty 30-cwt lorries, Ford Cars and motor ambulances proving useful on the comparatively flat ground.

I'd be very interested in knowing what the 30 cwt lorries were, and also the four wheel drive lorries, possibly FWD's?

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham



Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 628
Date:
Permalink   

http://www.seayourhistory.org.uk/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=13960

"RNAS" armoured car.

No sign of any other motorised vehicles on the various photos I've seen online.

__________________
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

A few shots here;

http://landships.activeboard.com/t52166064/british-vehicles-id/

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
Date:
Permalink   

Not much detail (just mentions "vehicles") but the logistical plan of the landings is discussed in http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p4013coll14/id/338/filename/339.pdf (conclusion: an utter schamozzle from the offset). Two floating piers were available for the initial landing, also tugs, lighters and the drop-front horse barges (suitable also for artillery landing). Piers were constructed in the following several months including, as I think one of the later ones, Watson's Pier, completed 18 June 1915, 100th anniversary of the Battle of Waterloo, the celebration of which event was mistaken by the official Australian war historian as a "dust-up" among the Australian Engineers and is commemorated in like fashion to this day (the RAE's annual Waterloo dinners).



-- Edited by Rectalgia on Tuesday 8th of January 2013 03:32:08 AM

__________________
Facimus et Frangimus


Brigadier

Status: Offline
Posts: 273
Date:
Permalink   

This is an interesting topic. i did not think that there would be much need for much MT in that theatre as it was hardly a war of movement and not much room for them to be parked. I am also very curious as to what they had there and how they unloaded them on to the beach. I think Mr Young had a photograph of a Holt said to be at Gallipoli but i have no idea how they would have got that on the shore.

I have come across several references to FWD's being referred to as "Four Wheel Drives" so i expect that answers that question.

Tim

__________________


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 628
Date:
Permalink   

I assume they'd be crained onto a Lighter, then disembarked onto a jetty, by crane again.

__________________
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

That's certainly how the Rolls Royce armoured cars were brought ashore. Later in the campaign, by the Suvla Bay landings in August, they had 'X Lighters' also called Black Beetles which were like modern landing craft with a ramp at the front

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham



Brigadier

Status: Offline
Posts: 273
Date:
Permalink   

I would assume so, but you would need a pretty big crane to unload a Holt 75.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard