Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: New Strelets 1/72 Guns set A001
RCD


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 185
Date:
New Strelets 1/72 Guns set A001
Permalink   


Just a couple of questions I have about the above set before ordering it . As A003 seems the one that many appear to be trying I thought I would go for A001 first.

1. The box art clearly shows WW1 but the figures shown on the Strelet Arms A001 area shows figures with Gaiters and Brodies/ netted  battlebowlers. If someone out there has this set are the figures WW1 or WW2?

2. Assuming that the set is indeed WW1 what colour would it be best to paint the gun - where they ever  camouflaged like the heavy piece in the Imperial war museum in London?



__________________
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

The gun is WW1 but figures are most definitely WW2. I haven't seen any photos of a 6 inch gun in camouflage before but happy to be corrected

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

Hi RCD You can see the figures here though the gun should have the motorised conversion, perhaps a suitable pair of wheels can be found... I do think it a shame as well that strelets didnt correct the traction wheels, but it does seem that posting on their forum in regards to faults in new masters is rather pointless... except for ideas for new products that is...

Still kudos to Strelets for pulling it off....

http://www.strelets-r.com/Pages/Set.aspx?SetID=219&M=Z

Cheerssmile



__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 

Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

You could possibly convert some into WW1 - convert the gaiters into puttees ending just below the knee, smooth the netting off the helmets and remove the equipment from the men's belts (the equipment is in the wrong place, and how often do you seen artillery crew wearing webbing when it's not obviously posed?!), sand the flap on the gas mask case (everyone seems to get the SBR bag the wrong way round) and you'd have a passable late1916 onwards artillery crew - or alternatively use HaT or WD Models figures

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 122
Date:
Permalink   

Hi,

I have A001 and it comes with late WW1 figures, not the WW2 ones shown on the Strelets site.


__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

RCD wrote:

... were they ever camouflaged like the heavy piece in the Imperial war museum in London?


Is there a camo scheme on this one, or is it a trick of the light:



__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 825
Date:
Permalink   

Phil

In answer to your last pic .This is a painting by Fortunino Matania.To me his is one of the finest Great Wat artists.I can not vouch for the accuracy of the colours.



Attachments
__________________
Barry John


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 825
Date:
Permalink   

For Great Wat read Great War !!!!!

Can't someone put a spell check on !!!!!!!!!!!!!



__________________
Barry John
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

Would love to see someone give that a go!

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham

PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

Over on the Strelets forum it is stated that this set comes with late WW1 British crew in tin hats.



__________________
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

Ahah, be interesting to see what the figures look like

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham

RCD


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 185
Date:
Permalink   

Thank you gentlemen will go for the A001 but may chicken out out on the Baldwins' paint scheme!



__________________


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 147
Date:
Permalink   

Any other evidence of those colours being used?

Mike

__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

mike_m wrote:

Any other evidence of those colours being used?

Mike


Not that I know of.

In the Osprey book on British heavy Artillery, Dale Clarke says that there are many fanciful interpretations by contemporary artists of the colours used on the big guns, but few actual photos showing whether a camouflage scheme was used or not. He also states that often just the muzzle was painted in a dazzle camo scheme to obscure its true outline: the underside of the muzzle would be painted white with a straight or jagged edge. I have seen photos that show that, but can't find one right now.



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

Theres always these....

 

Cheerssmile 



Attachments
__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 870
Date:
Permalink   

There definately seems to be a close resemblence between PDAs' picture and Baldwins painting, in the shapes on the barrels at least. But the colours may be lost in time.

Rob also has an original postcard showing a drawing of a siege howitzer in colour, on the Holt tractor post


Paul



-- Edited by Paul Bonnett on Saturday 24th of November 2012 03:51:08 AM



-- Edited by Paul Bonnett on Saturday 24th of November 2012 04:21:05 AM

__________________

 The finest stories of the Great War are those that will never be told.



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 122
Date:
Permalink   

Found this today - link - not a full picture, but it seems to be camouflaged.



__________________
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

I'd say so too - interestingly the two chaps on the left are wearing cardigans over their shirts

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard