Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Group build, anyone?


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:
Group build, anyone?
Permalink   


Hi guys and gals!

I'm thinking it's time for a group build on this forum. Perhaps we can even have a thread where we post a picture or two of our progress every second week or so, just to inspire and motivate each other.

What do you think?

 

Further ideas:

We can kick off the group build 1st January 2013, and it ends on New Year's Eve in December the same year.

As for a theme, it would probably have to be wide enough to include several types of vehicles, and yet narrow enough so that not everything can fit into the category.

I'm suggesting we call it "The Other Guys". Basically, vehicles and equipment not intended for combat, but the ones supporting the troops at the front indirectly.

This would include, but not be limited to: Supply tanks, trucks, unarmoured trains, artillery tractors, field kitchens e.t.c.

It would exclude, among other things: Tanks, armoured cars, armoured trains, artillery e.t.c.

So, what do you guys think? Ideas and suggestions?



__________________
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

Sounds good to me! May need some further limitations though - regarding armoured trains, the British had some lightly armoured 'petrol tractors' that were used for the light railways in more forward areas, not for combat but simply to protect the occupant, so kind of fits on both side of the exclusion

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham



Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 233
Date:
Permalink   

Hello,

Interesting idea, I have several subjects which go in this category.

And one year let me a chance to finish something biggrin

 

All the very best,



__________________

Eric

On going : Obice da 305/17 su affusto de Stefano, Mark 1 female ...

Finished : Dennis 3 tons lorry, Jeffery Poplavko, Renault EG, Renault FT



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 122
Date:
Permalink   

Sounds like a great idea!


__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

I'm in. Maybe a year isn't long enough for me, but it will still be fun trying.



__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:
Permalink   

Excellent turnout so far! I'll start a dedicated Group Build topic (which then one of the moderators can sticky for the duration of the group build, perhaps?) once we get closer to 2013. smile

 

Rob wrote:


regarding armoured trains, the British had some lightly armoured 'petrol tractors' that were used for the light railways in more forward areas, not for combat but simply to protect the occupant, so kind of fits on both side of the exclusion


  In this case, I'd say the petrol train fits the "Other Guys"-description.

I'm sure there will be plenty more vehicles who are in a grey-zone when it comes to categorizing them. The Gun Carrier Mk I is a good example: It's main purpose was to transport guns over rough terrain, which basically makes it a glorified artillery tractor. But it could (and was on occassion) used as a self-propelled gun, also making it a combat vehicle. Sort of.

In the end, I think it should be up to everyone's individual judgement whether their model is in the spirit of the theme. smile

I also think having your artillery tractor pull a gun is entirely within the theme. It's just that a gun in and of itself wouldn't qualify.

 

Does that sound like a good definition so far, or should we limit the definition?



__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

Sounds good to me and a great excuse to finally finish something.


__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 

Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

Sounds good to me

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

Kaiser wrote:

I'll start a dedicated Group Build topic (which then one of the moderators can sticky for the duration of the group build, perhaps?) 


 I've been wondering for months - what does "sticky" mean in this context?



__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:
Permalink   

TinCanTadpole wrote:
Kaiser wrote:

I'll start a dedicated Group Build topic (which then one of the moderators can sticky for the duration of the group build, perhaps?) 


 I've been wondering for months - what does "sticky" mean in this context?


Basically, it means the topic is "stuck" at the top of the sub-forum, regardless of whether anyone starts a new topic in the sub-forum or writes at all in the "stickied" topic.

The two topics stickied in the modelling sub-forum are the "Buy, Sell and Trade" and "Introducing My New Company"-topics which stay at the top of the sub-forum regardless of activity, or lack thereof.

Hope that makes sense. I'm not so savvy when it comes to using correct terminology with computers and internet. smile



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

That makes perfect sense, thanks.

__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 825
Date:
Permalink   

I know I shouldn't but what the hell. Count me in.



__________________
Barry John
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

One good thing about this group build proposal so far is that I have started trying to finish the models I am working on to clear some space on my bench.



__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 870
Date:
Permalink   

OK count me in, might be able to rattle something up within 12 months ! As long as dioramas are included ?
Paul

__________________

 The finest stories of the Great War are those that will never be told.



Brigadier

Status: Offline
Posts: 281
Date:
Permalink   

That's indeed what I needed to get to work on some of the models I bought this year; nice plan! Anyone interested to add a little competition? I would suggest we find 3 volunteers to judge the models from the photo's and pick a couple of winners. I'll have some sets of Great War decals available for the winners, and there are undoubtedly some other traders/producers on this forum willing to add some prizes?

cheers,
Michel



__________________
www.blackliondecals.nl


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 825
Date:
Permalink   

OK,I will go for that as well.



__________________
Barry John


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:
Permalink   

Paul Bonnett wrote:

 As long as dioramas are included ?


 Perfectly fine by me, as long as they are in the spirit of the theme. smile

 

Michel Boer, That sounds like an excellent idea to me! Nothing gets you building like a bit of incentive. ~_^

I'm sure I could find volunteers to judge from my local IPMS club, but I'm afraid that might give me an unfair advantage as they'll probably be able to see my model in real life at one point or another (which may or may not benefit the judging of it...). Another alternative is to settle the competition by voting: All members of the Landships forum get to cast one vote, using the forum's polling function.



__________________


Sergeant

Status: Offline
Posts: 30
Date:
Permalink   

I've a fancy to build one of the war emergency tugs - would that be in keeping?



__________________

"Another day, another dolour"



Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:
Permalink   

I don't know quite what that is, but again, I feel it should be left to our own responsibilities to decide whether a model is in the spirit of the theme. smile



__________________


Sergeant

Status: Offline
Posts: 30
Date:
Permalink   

http://www.papershipwright.co.uk/tugs-king-tut-samson/

 

Built for the Ministry of War in 1915 to help handle the incresed workload in the Port of London, and make up for the vessels taken over for and to support the RN.

 

http://cfp.muerell.de/products/16/details

 

This one, in her WWI state, is a possible alternative (unfortunately Horst's drifter is supplied in WWII WA-style colours)



__________________

"Another day, another dolour"



Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:
Permalink   

Cool!

What material will you build her out of?



__________________


Sergeant

Status: Offline
Posts: 30
Date:
Permalink   

They are paper (more accurately, card) models.



__________________

"Another day, another dolour"



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 870
Date:
Permalink   

Will it be in ones chosen scale as well

__________________

 The finest stories of the Great War are those that will never be told.



Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

Michel Boer wrote:

That's indeed what I needed to get to work on some of the models I bought this year; nice plan! Anyone interested to add a little competition? I would suggest we find 3 volunteers to judge the models from the photo's and pick a couple of winners. I'll have some sets of Great War decals available for the winners, and there are undoubtedly some other traders/producers on this forum willing to add some prizes?

cheers,
Michel


 Great idea Michel, I'm sure Mr.X will be happy to make a contribution too.

 

Bern



__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 147
Date:
Permalink   

Òh go on then, this is the kind of thing I like in any case

Mike

__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 808
Date:
Permalink   

Away from tearing my hair out doing computer stuff like plans, my normal love is clay work.... is it ok to do a one off figure/vignette? Say 1/16 scale.



__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:
Permalink   

MK1 Nut wrote:

Away from tearing my hair out doing computer stuff like plans, my normal love is clay work.... is it ok to do a one off figure/vignette? Say 1/16 scale.


 I'd say yes, as long as it's in the spirit of the theme.

An infantry man or artillerist wouldn't really fit. But a nurse, horse handler, courier, truck driver or pidgeon caretaker? Yes, definetly.



__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 808
Date:
Permalink   

OK will put my thinking head on. May regret this next year. :)



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

Helen, as a "Mk 1 Nut", how about a Royal Navy tank tester?

__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 808
Date:
Permalink   

TinCanTadpole wrote:

Helen, as a "Mk 1 Nut", how about a Royal Navy tank tester?


 I can't even say it! smile

Got a photo???



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

Nope, haven't got a photo, but I don't expect it would be too difficult to find pics of RN personnel involved with testing the tanks. There is a photo of such a man standing on top of a Mk III (I think that's what it is) that is laden with fuel tins, if memory serves. Can't remember if it's a particularly good photo though. I'll see if I can remember where I saw it.

__________________


General

Status: Offline
Posts: 345
Date:
Permalink   

The X Armee Korps Accepts the challenge

Grettings, Josh

__________________

"General, you have nobly protected your forts. Keep your sword...to have crossed swords with you has been an honor, sir." General der Infantrie, Otto von Emmich
              

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard