I'm thinking it's time for a group build on this forum. Perhaps we can even have a thread where we post a picture or two of our progress every second week or so, just to inspire and motivate each other.
What do you think?
Further ideas:
We can kick off the group build 1st January 2013, and it ends on New Year's Eve in December the same year.
As for a theme, it would probably have to be wide enough to include several types of vehicles, and yet narrow enough so that not everything can fit into the category.
I'm suggesting we call it "The Other Guys". Basically, vehicles and equipment not intended for combat, but the ones supporting the troops at the front indirectly.
This would include, but not be limited to: Supply tanks, trucks, unarmoured trains, artillery tractors, field kitchens e.t.c.
It would exclude, among other things: Tanks, armoured cars, armoured trains, artillery e.t.c.
So, what do you guys think? Ideas and suggestions?
Sounds good to me! May need some further limitations though - regarding armoured trains, the British had some lightly armoured 'petrol tractors' that were used for the light railways in more forward areas, not for combat but simply to protect the occupant, so kind of fits on both side of the exclusion
Excellent turnout so far! I'll start a dedicated Group Build topic (which then one of the moderators can sticky for the duration of the group build, perhaps?) once we get closer to 2013.
Rob wrote:
regarding armoured trains, the British had some lightly armoured 'petrol tractors' that were used for the light railways in more forward areas, not for combat but simply to protect the occupant, so kind of fits on both side of the exclusion
In this case, I'd say the petrol train fits the "Other Guys"-description.
I'm sure there will be plenty more vehicles who are in a grey-zone when it comes to categorizing them. The Gun Carrier Mk I is a good example: It's main purpose was to transport guns over rough terrain, which basically makes it a glorified artillery tractor. But it could (and was on occassion) used as a self-propelled gun, also making it a combat vehicle. Sort of.
In the end, I think it should be up to everyone's individual judgement whether their model is in the spirit of the theme.
I also think having your artillery tractor pull a gun is entirely within the theme. It's just that a gun in and of itself wouldn't qualify.
Does that sound like a good definition so far, or should we limit the definition?
I'll start a dedicated Group Build topic (which then one of the moderators can sticky for the duration of the group build, perhaps?)
I've been wondering for months - what does "sticky" mean in this context?
Basically, it means the topic is "stuck" at the top of the sub-forum, regardless of whether anyone starts a new topic in the sub-forum or writes at all in the "stickied" topic.
The two topics stickied in the modelling sub-forum are the "Buy, Sell and Trade" and "Introducing My New Company"-topics which stay at the top of the sub-forum regardless of activity, or lack thereof.
Hope that makes sense. I'm not so savvy when it comes to using correct terminology with computers and internet.
One good thing about this group build proposal so far is that I have started trying to finish the models I am working on to clear some space on my bench.
That's indeed what I needed to get to work on some of the models I bought this year; nice plan! Anyone interested to add a little competition? I would suggest we find 3 volunteers to judge the models from the photo's and pick a couple of winners. I'll have some sets of Great War decals available for the winners, and there are undoubtedly some other traders/producers on this forum willing to add some prizes?
Perfectly fine by me, as long as they are in the spirit of the theme.
Michel Boer, That sounds like an excellent idea to me! Nothing gets you building like a bit of incentive. ~_^
I'm sure I could find volunteers to judge from my local IPMS club, but I'm afraid that might give me an unfair advantage as they'll probably be able to see my model in real life at one point or another (which may or may not benefit the judging of it...). Another alternative is to settle the competition by voting: All members of the Landships forum get to cast one vote, using the forum's polling function.
I don't know quite what that is, but again, I feel it should be left to our own responsibilities to decide whether a model is in the spirit of the theme.
Built for the Ministry of War in 1915 to help handle the incresed workload in the Port of London, and make up for the vessels taken over for and to support the RN.
That's indeed what I needed to get to work on some of the models I bought this year; nice plan! Anyone interested to add a little competition? I would suggest we find 3 volunteers to judge the models from the photo's and pick a couple of winners. I'll have some sets of Great War decals available for the winners, and there are undoubtedly some other traders/producers on this forum willing to add some prizes?
cheers, Michel
Great idea Michel, I'm sure Mr.X will be happy to make a contribution too.
Bern
__________________
Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?
Away from tearing my hair out doing computer stuff like plans, my normal love is clay work.... is it ok to do a one off figure/vignette? Say 1/16 scale.
Away from tearing my hair out doing computer stuff like plans, my normal love is clay work.... is it ok to do a one off figure/vignette? Say 1/16 scale.
I'd say yes, as long as it's in the spirit of the theme.
An infantry man or artillerist wouldn't really fit. But a nurse, horse handler, courier, truck driver or pidgeon caretaker? Yes, definetly.
Nope, haven't got a photo, but I don't expect it would be too difficult to find pics of RN personnel involved with testing the tanks. There is a photo of such a man standing on top of a Mk III (I think that's what it is) that is laden with fuel tins, if memory serves. Can't remember if it's a particularly good photo though. I'll see if I can remember where I saw it.
"General, you have nobly protected your forts. Keep your sword...to have crossed swords with you has been an honor, sir." General der Infantrie, Otto von Emmich