Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The Hydraulic Ram on the Stern of a MkI
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
The Hydraulic Ram on the Stern of a MkI
Permalink   


Couple of questions on the hydraulic ram/pump/jack on the back of a MkI.

Were they all armoured (or covered or plated) like the one on Sir Archibald in Gaza, or was that just a Palestine Detachment modification?

What way up were they? The Airfix instructions direct you to put the cylinder at the bottom, and a sampling of built Airfix kits shows that sometimes the cylinder is on top, sometimes on the bottom. Is it possible that Airifx have accurately copied a mistake made by The Tank Museum staff, have Airfix just made a mistake, or are they correct? Are there any good, clear contemporary photos of real MkI tanks' derrières?



__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 808
Date:
Permalink   

Ummm.... should know this. confuse

Will go look at my photos, but I 'think' that they all had shields, although not all used them as they got in the way, and the Gaza sheild was much larger and as much a cover as anything due to the mechanism no longer being used.

As for museum tanks, they get better as more research is done, so if anything changes on them, then go with the recent photos. Other than that, any tank while in service.

Helen x



__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks Helen. so they all had shields but they did not look like those on the Gaza tanks:

And I've attached a pic of what I'm talking about with the Airfix kit.



Attachments
__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 808
Date:
Permalink   

Looks like my brain is having a holiday, or it's one of those dreaded 'read it somewhere' thingys... No, they did'nt have a sheild when in use in Europe. Just one of the many Gaza modifications.

As for the Airfix kit....... Oh Dear God, tell me it hasn't always been like that!?!?! It's upside down! the ram is pointing upwards.no



__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 433
Date:
Permalink   

I suspect that the shields were a modification introduced during October or November 1916. None of the photos showing tanks in action (or wrecked) at Flers-Courcelette on Sept. 15, or Thiepval/Morval on Sept. 25/26, which I have seen show the shield in place. However, the shield is present in photos taken in November. All of the Gaza detachment tanks seem to have had the shield, despite no longer carrying a hyraulic ram. Presumably it was retained to protect the apertures for the radiator drain and filler.



-- Edited by Rhomboid on Sunday 30th of December 2012 08:36:29 PM

Attachments
__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 808
Date:
Permalink   

I do love it when I'm wrong! I know that's a strange thing to say, but it normally means I've learnt something new.

The photo of Sir Archibald is in fact NOT a Gaza modification, but in fact a very rare example of the standard sheild in use.

I had a look back through my copy of 'The Tanks of Flers' by Trevor Pidgeon, and there is the reference to the sheild with its Rear Light. On looking at the photo again, it is quite clear the sheild is a well made riveted afair and there on the top right hand corner is the bracket for the tail light.

The sheild attaches to the sides of the Hydraulics bracket, not the rear of the tank. You can see two of the bolts in the photo.

Love history, always something new to learn.

Helen x



__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

MK1 Nut wrote:

...in fact a very rare example of the standard shield in use...


Are there any other photos that show the back of a MkI as clearly?



__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

Just looking through my Mk.1 pics with tail wheels still fitted it appears some had the shield fitted but not others, C19 Clan Leslie doesn't have one but the wrecked A company female does... not very conclusive! 



Attachments
__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 



Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 433
Date:
Permalink   

The mistake in the Airfix instructions would seem to belong to whoever drew them up. As you are aware, the subject of the Airfix kit seems to be tank 785, a MkII modified after WWI to resemble a MkI. Photos of 785 taken at Bovington Camp after the war, and at Chertsey in the 1950's show the hydraulic tank in the correct position. The  tail was fitted to the Hatfield Park MkI after its arrival at the Tank Museum in the late 1960's, and photos from this era show that it was again correctly installed.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard