Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Emhar A7V


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Emhar A7V
Permalink   


Built pretty much straight out of the box, the only improvements were to blank off the vents as I didn't like the see through effect, filled in the odd shape gun sighting hole with plastic card and re-cut the correct "T" shape and added some shims top and bottom to the gun shield as it was very gappy.

Just needs decals and weathering to be called done.



-- Edited by CrashandBern on Sunday 13th of July 2014 05:30:48 PM



-- Edited by CrashandBern on Sunday 13th of July 2014 05:31:09 PM



-- Edited by CrashandBern on Sunday 13th of July 2014 05:31:32 PM

Attachments
__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Great! I have this kit and never had the time to start it!

__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

Looks great! You do very neat work!



__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks for the kind comments gents.

 

Clear coat and decals on.

I have to say the Emhar decals were absolutely excellent despite having a lot of carrier film (which I trimmed most off anyway) one coat of micro-sol and they pulled down over rivets and hatch hinges without any drama and the carrier film completely disappeared. They are some of the thinnest decals I have ever seen, robust enough to slide around into position without breaking up and were in perfect registration.

Having said all that the arms of the crosses are much too slim and didn't match the pictures I have of Mephisto so were replaced with a selection of Almark and FCM aircraft decals... pity really as neither were as good in performance as the Emhar decals.

 

Anyway here's the pictures for your viewing pleasure!

     



-- Edited by CrashandBern on Tuesday 15th of July 2014 01:54:52 PM

Attachments
__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 



Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

So the idea behind the weathering was a dusty, muddy tank left out in the rain and gone streaky. It's a technique I haven't used before, basically a standard oil wash left to go tacky then streaked from top to bottom with a flat wide bush dipped in thinners but wiped off until nearly dry. For the heavier streaks like the ones from the corners of the machine gun ports a tiny blob of oil paint was deposited and streaked in the same way.
I think it came out pretty well... although I may have got a little carried away but I'd really like to hear what you think of it.



-- Edited by CrashandBern on Wednesday 16th of July 2014 08:11:54 PM

Attachments
__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 



Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

Ok so I'm calling this done now, the final touches were to paint the machine guns flat black and dry-brush them with graphite powder, wash the track units with several more shades of brown and orange and then muddy them up with ground pastels. 



Attachments
__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Beautiful model! Love the rusty streaks.

__________________


General

Status: Offline
Posts: 386
Date:
Permalink   

Very well done! The markings and paint look great.



__________________
John Kelley


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

Thank you very much gents, for a first time technique try out I was pretty pleased with how it came out.

__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 146
Date:
Permalink   

Neatly done. Looks plastic and toy-like even with the weathering, though. I think it may be because of the clear coat.



__________________
...


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Date:
Permalink   

Do you think so? I guess it looks fine and not overly weathered as many tanks models look these days. I admit, though, that a model placed on a cutting mat and in plain light can do little to deceive the eye and disguise the fact that's made in a small scale. I'd love to see this model in a scenic base and photographed in a low angle with a difussed light source!
Speaking of tank models in general, I think that one of the main disadvantages of these vehicles is that even with the best of the building and paint techniques, the very shapes of them make them look like small boxes. And that's because the real vehicles were just big metal boxes painted green!



-- Edited by d_fernetti on Wednesday 30th of July 2014 12:15:27 PM

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks for the feedback gents it's always good to get some honest criticism.

Morgoth what is it about the model that makes you say it looks plastic and toy like? Is it that it's a satin finish not entirely matt or is something else? It would be good to know so I can either correct it on this one or bear it in mind for future projects if I think it would improve the results.

 

Btw. there will be a small base for this one but like the other 6 tanks it's waiting it's turn. 



-- Edited by CrashandBern on Wednesday 30th of July 2014 09:52:28 AM

__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 145
Date:
Permalink   

CrashandBern,

When I first looked at this I thought it was 1/35th.  Then I saw the one piece track units and realized it was not the Tauro kit!  Hope you don't mind me saying this but the weathering on this one could be your best! 

Rob



__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 454
Date:
Permalink   

Thank you very much Rob, I'm glad you like it.

__________________

Has anyone else noticed "new and improved" seems to mean it doesn't work as well as it used to?

 



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 146
Date:
Permalink   

CrashandBern wrote:

Thanks for the feedback gents it's always good to get some honest criticism.

Morgoth what is it about the model that makes you say it looks plastic and toy like? Is it that it's a satin finish not entirely matt or is something else? It would be good to know so I can either correct it on this one or bear it in mind for future projects if I think it would improve the results.


 I think it's the non-matt finish. It could be also something about surface details. Though I'm not sure what exactly, I never got beyond the beginning stages of modelling due to lack of manual abilities to not break stuff or not leave fingerprints, etc.

These guys seem to be pretty hardcore (and by the way, they are the main reason why I got seriously interested in WWI - it's a shame Wh40k miniatures were not made with realistic miniature proportions, though.).

http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Warhammer-40000/Imperial_Guard/Imperial_Guard_Super_Heavy_Tanks

They published two advanced modelling textbooks:

http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Modelling-Supplies/IMPERIAL-ARMOUR-MODEL-MASTERCLASS-VOLUME-ONE.html

Maybe they could help in further development.



__________________
...
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard